QTUM vs. CHPS

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

QTUM (Defiance Quantum ETF) and CHPS (Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QTUM is a Technology Equities fund tracking the BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index, while CHPS is a Semiconductors fund tracking the Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, QTUM returned 95.36% vs 223.67% for CHPS. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QTUM charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for CHPS.

Performance

QTUM vs. CHPS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) and Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QTUM achieves a 53.29% return, which is significantly lower than CHPS's 107.97% return.

QTUM

• 1D: -0.59%
• 1M: 23.63%
• YTD: 53.29%
• 6M: 50.69%
• 1Y: 95.36%
• 3Y*: 52.22%
• 5Y*: 29.15%
• 10Y*: —

CHPS

• 1D: 1.86%
• 1M: 32.32%
• YTD: 107.97%
• 6M: 109.04%
• 1Y: 223.67%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QTUM vs. CHPS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF	53.29%	36.65%	50.54%	4.01%
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF	107.97%	58.47%	7.75%	10.88%

Correlation

The correlation between QTUM and CHPS is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2023	0.86

The correlation between QTUM and CHPS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

QTUM vs. CHPS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QTUM	CHPS
Technology	84.2%	98.8%
Industrials	9.0%	0.4%
Communication Services	5.3%	-
Consumer Cyclical	0.8%	-
Healthcare	0.7%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	0.5%
Financial Services	-	0.2%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

QTUM vs. CHPS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QTUM

QTUM Risk / Return Rank: 91
QTUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
QTUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
QTUM Omega Ratio Rank: 87
QTUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
QTUM Martin Ratio Rank: 92

CHPS

CHPS Risk / Return Rank: 97
CHPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
CHPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
CHPS Omega Ratio Rank: 96
CHPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
CHPS Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QTUM vs. CHPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) and Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QTUM	CHPS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.65	6.54	-2.89
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.26	6.07	-1.81
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.55	1.81	-0.26
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.28	12.87	-6.59
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	23.69	49.99	-26.29
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QTUM vs. CHPS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QTUM Sharpe Ratio is 3.65, which is lower than the CHPS Sharpe Ratio of 6.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QTUM and CHPS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QTUM	CHPS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.65	6.54	-2.89
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.10	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.08	1.81	-0.73

Drawdowns

QTUM vs. CHPS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QTUM drawdown since its inception was -38.45%, roughly equal to the maximum CHPS drawdown of -39.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTUM and CHPS.

Drawdown Indicators

	QTUM	CHPS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.45%	-39.44%	+0.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.26%	-17.50%	+2.24%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.39%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.45%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.59%	0.00%	-0.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.25%	-9.16%	+0.91%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.04%	4.50%	-0.46%

Volatility

QTUM vs. CHPS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) is 9.76%, while Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS) has a volatility of 14.18%. This indicates that QTUM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHPS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QTUM	CHPS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.76%	14.18%	-4.42%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.35%	28.19%	-7.84%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.26%	34.43%	-8.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.56%	33.78%	-7.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.17%	33.78%	-6.61%

QTUM vs. CHPS - Expense Ratio Comparison

QTUM has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than CHPS's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

QTUM vs. CHPS - Dividend Comparison

QTUM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%, more than CHPS's 0.32% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF	0.32%	0.68%	1.75%	0.36%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF	0.70%	1.01%	0.61%	0.81%	1.46%	0.48%	0.42%	0.61%	0.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QTUM and CHPS in my portfolio?

QTUM and CHPS have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QTUM or CHPS?

CHPS has higher volatility (14.18%) compared to QTUM (9.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QTUM dropped -38.45% vs CHPS's -39.44%.

Which ETF is better, QTUM or CHPS?

On 1-year performance, CHPS leads with 223.67% vs 95.36% for QTUM. On fees, CHPS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, QTUM has been the lower-risk option at 9.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QTUM or CHPS?

Over the 1-year period, CHPS has performed better with a 223.67% return vs 95.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QTUM or CHPS?

CHPS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for QTUM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QTUM or CHPS?

QTUM has the higher dividend yield at 0.70%, compared with 0.32% for CHPS.

What is the main difference between QTUM and CHPS?

QTUM is categorized as Technology Equities, while CHPS is Semiconductors. QTUM tracks BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index, while CHPS tracks Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for QTUM and 0.15% for CHPS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CHPS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.54 vs 3.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.