QTUM vs. AIRR
QTUM (Defiance Quantum ETF) and AIRR (First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QTUM is a Technology Equities fund tracking the BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index, while AIRR is a Building & Construction fund tracking the Richard Bernstein Advisors American Industrial Renaissance Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QTUM returned 28.09%/yr vs 25.46%/yr for AIRR. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QTUM charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for AIRR.
Performance
QTUM vs. AIRR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QTUM achieves a 47.39% return, which is significantly higher than AIRR's 31.74% return.
QTUM
- 1D
- 1.22%
- 1M
- 9.88%
- YTD
- 47.39%
- 6M
- 45.72%
- 1Y
- 82.93%
- 3Y*
- 48.15%
- 5Y*
- 28.09%
- 10Y*
- —
AIRR
- 1D
- 0.83%
- 1M
- -0.02%
- YTD
- 31.74%
- 6M
- 28.77%
- 1Y
- 65.25%
- 3Y*
- 35.29%
- 5Y*
- 25.46%
- 10Y*
- 22.05%
QTUM vs. AIRR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF | 47.39% | 36.65% | 50.54% | 39.86% | -28.80% | 35.18% | 42.05% | 47.99% | -19.44% |
AIRR First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF | 31.74% | 27.92% | 33.45% | 31.43% | -2.08% | 33.01% | 17.17% | 33.97% | -21.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between QTUM and AIRR is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2018 | 0.67 |
The correlation between QTUM and AIRR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.
QTUM vs. AIRR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QTUM
AIRR
Technology
Industrials
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
QTUM
AIRR
Industrials
QTUM
AIRR
Communication Services
QTUM
AIRR
-
Consumer Cyclical
QTUM
AIRR
-
Healthcare
QTUM
AIRR
-
Basic Materials
QTUM
-
AIRR
-
Consumer Defensive
QTUM
-
AIRR
-
Energy
QTUM
-
AIRR
Financial Services
QTUM
-
AIRR
Real Estate
QTUM
-
AIRR
-
Utilities
QTUM
-
AIRR
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QTUM vs. AIRR — Risk / Return Rank
QTUM
AIRR
QTUM vs. AIRR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) and First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF (AIRR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QTUM | AIRR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.40 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.46 | 5.01 | +0.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.77 | 18.33 | +1.43 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QTUM vs. AIRR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QTUM drawdown since its inception was -38.45%, smaller than the maximum AIRR drawdown of -42.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTUM and AIRR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QTUM | AIRR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.45% | -42.37% | +3.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.26% | -13.09% | -2.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.39% | -27.95% | +2.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.45% | -27.95% | -10.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.42% | -1.89% | -2.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.24% | -7.48% | -0.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.21% | 3.57% | +0.64% |
Volatility
QTUM vs. AIRR - Volatility Comparison
Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) has a higher volatility of 14.18% compared to First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF (AIRR) at 9.32%. This indicates that QTUM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AIRR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QTUM | AIRR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.18% | 9.32% | +4.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.17% | 20.81% | +2.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.39% | 26.19% | +2.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.99% | 25.45% | +1.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.40% | 26.36% | +1.04% |
QTUM vs. AIRR - Expense Ratio Comparison
QTUM has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than AIRR's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
QTUM vs. AIRR - Dividend Comparison
QTUM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, more than AIRR's 0.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIRR First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF | 0.13% | 0.19% | 0.18% | 0.23% | 0.12% | 0.05% | 0.10% | 0.20% | 0.43% | 0.30% | 0.08% | 0.47% |
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF | 0.73% | 1.01% | 0.61% | 0.81% | 1.46% | 0.48% | 0.42% | 0.61% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QTUM and AIRR have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QTUM has higher volatility (14.18%) compared to AIRR (9.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QTUM dropped -38.45% vs AIRR's -42.37%.
On 5-year performance, QTUM leads with 28.09% vs 25.46% for AIRR. On fees, QTUM is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, AIRR has been the lower-risk option at 9.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QTUM has performed better with a 28.09% return vs 25.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QTUM is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for AIRR.
QTUM has the higher dividend yield at 0.73%, compared with 0.13% for AIRR.
QTUM is categorized as Technology Equities, while AIRR is Building & Construction. QTUM tracks BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index, while AIRR tracks Richard Bernstein Advisors American Industrial Renaissance Index. They also come from different issuers: Defiance and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for QTUM and 0.69% for AIRR.
QTUM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.94 vs 2.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QTUM and AIRR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer