QTSSX vs. RESGX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

QTSSX (Quantified Tactical Sectors Fund) and RESGX (Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, QTSSX returned -4.04%/yr vs 10.15%/yr for RESGX. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QTSSX charges 1.56%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for RESGX.

Performance

QTSSX vs. RESGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Quantified Tactical Sectors Fund (QTSSX) and Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio (RESGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QTSSX achieves a 17.30% return, which is significantly lower than RESGX's 27.23% return.

QTSSX

• 1D: -0.80%
• 1M: 10.15%
• YTD: 17.30%
• 6M: 13.82%
• 1Y: 38.83%
• 3Y*: 14.35%
• 5Y*: -4.04%
• 10Y*: —

RESGX

• 1D: -0.44%
• 1M: 7.85%
• YTD: 27.23%
• 6M: 27.44%
• 1Y: 43.13%
• 3Y*: 20.24%
• 5Y*: 10.15%
• 10Y*: 13.11%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QTSSX vs. RESGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
QTSSX Quantified Tactical Sectors Fund	17.30%	4.10%	13.88%	13.97%	-27.55%	-16.61%
RESGX Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio	27.23%	10.30%	11.40%	15.59%	-14.71%	16.85%

Correlation

The correlation between QTSSX and RESGX is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.71
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.72
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.71
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 4, 2021	0.71

The correlation between QTSSX and RESGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

QTSSX vs. RESGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QTSSX

QTSSX Risk / Return Rank: 49
QTSSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
QTSSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
QTSSX Omega Ratio Rank: 40
QTSSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
QTSSX Martin Ratio Rank: 46

RESGX

RESGX Risk / Return Rank: 89
RESGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
RESGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
RESGX Omega Ratio Rank: 81
RESGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
RESGX Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QTSSX vs. RESGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Quantified Tactical Sectors Fund (QTSSX) and Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio (RESGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QTSSX	RESGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.91	3.07	-1.16
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.51	4.16	-1.65
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.53	-0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.38	5.63	-2.25
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.28	20.42	-11.14
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QTSSX vs. RESGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QTSSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is lower than the RESGX Sharpe Ratio of 3.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QTSSX and RESGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QTSSX	RESGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.91	3.07	-1.16
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.18	0.59	-0.77
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.70	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.04	0.71	-0.75

Drawdowns

QTSSX vs. RESGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QTSSX drawdown since its inception was -52.27%, which is greater than RESGX's maximum drawdown of -37.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTSSX and RESGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	QTSSX	RESGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-52.27%	-37.80%	-14.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.53%	-7.84%	-3.69%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.77%	-20.50%	-4.27%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-52.27%	-23.58%	-28.69%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-37.80%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-18.65%	-0.44%	-18.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-35.87%	-5.00%	-30.87%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.20%	2.15%	+2.05%

Volatility

QTSSX vs. RESGX - Volatility Comparison

Quantified Tactical Sectors Fund (QTSSX) has a higher volatility of 8.38% compared to Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio (RESGX) at 5.41%. This indicates that QTSSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RESGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QTSSX	RESGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.38%	5.41%	+2.97%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.61%	11.02%	+3.59%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.47%	14.42%	+6.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.82%	17.26%	+5.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.64%	18.71%	+4.93%

QTSSX vs. RESGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QTSSX has a 1.56% expense ratio, which is higher than RESGX's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

QTSSX vs. RESGX - Dividend Comparison

QTSSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, less than RESGX's 6.55% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
QTSSX Quantified Tactical Sectors Fund	0.39%	0.45%	0.00%	6.30%	0.19%	3.11%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RESGX Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio	6.55%	8.24%	13.38%	9.08%	8.17%	9.98%	0.82%	1.90%	5.09%	0.94%	0.72%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QTSSX and RESGX in my portfolio?

QTSSX and RESGX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QTSSX or RESGX?

QTSSX has higher volatility (8.38%) compared to RESGX (5.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QTSSX dropped -52.27% vs RESGX's -37.80%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RESGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.06 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.