QTSSX vs. RCKSX
Compare and contrast key facts about Quantified Tactical Sectors Fund (QTSSX) and Rock Oak Core Growth Fund (RCKSX).
QTSSX is managed by Advisors Preferred. It was launched on Mar 3, 2021. RCKSX is managed by Oak Associates. It was launched on Dec 31, 2004.
Performance
QTSSX vs. RCKSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
QTSSX vs. RCKSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QTSSX Quantified Tactical Sectors Fund | -4.19% | 4.10% | 13.88% | 13.97% | -27.55% | -16.61% |
RCKSX Rock Oak Core Growth Fund | 7.71% | 12.99% | 15.12% | 15.57% | -18.09% | 3.84% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QTSSX achieves a -4.19% return, which is significantly lower than RCKSX's 7.71% return.
QTSSX
- 1D
- 2.01%
- 1M
- -7.44%
- YTD
- -4.19%
- 6M
- -6.55%
- 1Y
- 13.22%
- 3Y*
- 9.49%
- 5Y*
- -5.21%
- 10Y*
- —
RCKSX
- 1D
- 1.56%
- 1M
- -1.74%
- YTD
- 7.71%
- 6M
- 8.21%
- 1Y
- 22.14%
- 3Y*
- 17.13%
- 5Y*
- 5.93%
- 10Y*
- 10.38%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QTSSX vs. RCKSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
QTSSX has a 1.56% expense ratio, which is higher than RCKSX's 1.25% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
QTSSX vs. RCKSX — Risk / Return Rank
QTSSX
RCKSX
QTSSX vs. RCKSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Quantified Tactical Sectors Fund (QTSSX) and Rock Oak Core Growth Fund (RCKSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QTSSX | RCKSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.62 | 1.40 | -0.79 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.95 | 2.06 | -1.11 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.28 | -0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.18 | 2.09 | -0.91 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.84 | 10.93 | -8.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QTSSX | RCKSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 | 1.40 | -0.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.22 | 0.38 | -0.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.59 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.20 | 0.37 | -0.57 |
Correlation
The correlation between QTSSX and RCKSX is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
QTSSX vs. RCKSX - Dividend Comparison
QTSSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%, less than RCKSX's 5.81% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QTSSX Quantified Tactical Sectors Fund | 0.47% | 0.45% | 0.00% | 6.30% | 0.19% | 3.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RCKSX Rock Oak Core Growth Fund | 5.81% | 6.26% | 0.47% | 0.71% | 1.00% | 4.31% | 16.56% | 3.18% | 0.59% | 5.91% | 0.70% | 3.21% |
Drawdowns
QTSSX vs. RCKSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QTSSX drawdown since its inception was -52.27%, smaller than the maximum RCKSX drawdown of -57.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTSSX and RCKSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| QTSSX | RCKSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.27% | -57.88% | +5.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.53% | -11.29% | -0.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -52.27% | -23.50% | -28.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.10% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.55% | -1.74% | -31.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.19% | -9.58% | -26.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.78% | 2.16% | +2.62% |
Volatility
QTSSX vs. RCKSX - Volatility Comparison
Quantified Tactical Sectors Fund (QTSSX) has a higher volatility of 5.93% compared to Rock Oak Core Growth Fund (RCKSX) at 3.72%. This indicates that QTSSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RCKSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| QTSSX | RCKSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.93% | 3.72% | +2.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.18% | 8.88% | +6.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.64% | 16.40% | +4.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.38% | 15.78% | +7.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.64% | 17.59% | +6.05% |