PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QTSSX vs. NWAUX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QTSSX vs. NWAUX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Quantified Tactical Sectors Fund (QTSSX) and Nationwide GQG US Quality Equity Fund (NWAUX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QTSSX achieves a 15.00% return, which is significantly higher than NWAUX's 2.66% return.


QTSSX

1D
0.24%
1M
2.78%
YTD
15.00%
6M
12.62%
1Y
34.40%
3Y*
12.35%
5Y*
-2.73%
10Y*

NWAUX

1D
0.36%
1M
-5.28%
YTD
2.66%
6M
2.81%
1Y
0.44%
3Y*
11.66%
5Y*
9.15%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QTSSX vs. NWAUX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
QTSSX
Quantified Tactical Sectors Fund
15.00%4.10%13.88%13.97%-27.55%-21.03%
NWAUX
Nationwide GQG US Quality Equity Fund
2.66%-4.92%27.90%18.30%-3.23%22.65%

Correlation

The correlation between QTSSX and NWAUX is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2021

0.57

The correlation between QTSSX and NWAUX shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.58 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QTSSX vs. NWAUX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QTSSX
QTSSX Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
QTSSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTSSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTSSX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
QTSSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTSSX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

NWAUX
NWAUX Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
NWAUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NWAUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
NWAUX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
NWAUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
NWAUX Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QTSSX vs. NWAUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Quantified Tactical Sectors Fund (QTSSX) and Nationwide GQG US Quality Equity Fund (NWAUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QTSSXNWAUXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.03

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.24

0.17

+3.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.76

0.45

+8.31

QTSSX vs. NWAUX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QTSSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is higher than the NWAUX Sharpe Ratio of 0.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QTSSX and NWAUX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QTSSX vs. NWAUX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QTSSX drawdown since its inception was -52.27%, which is greater than NWAUX's maximum drawdown of -21.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTSSX and NWAUX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QTSSXNWAUXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.27%

-21.07%

-31.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.53%

-8.55%

-2.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.77%

-19.31%

-5.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.20%

-21.07%

-28.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.24%

-13.00%

-7.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.70%

-6.96%

-28.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.26%

3.31%

+0.95%

Volatility

QTSSX vs. NWAUX - Volatility Comparison

Quantified Tactical Sectors Fund (QTSSX) has a higher volatility of 7.16% compared to Nationwide GQG US Quality Equity Fund (NWAUX) at 3.62%. This indicates that QTSSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NWAUX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QTSSXNWAUXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.16%

3.62%

+3.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.18%

7.96%

+7.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.90%

10.43%

+10.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.25%

16.12%

+6.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.66%

15.91%

+7.75%

QTSSX vs. NWAUX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QTSSX has a 1.56% expense ratio, which is higher than NWAUX's 0.74% expense ratio.


Dividends

QTSSX vs. NWAUX - Dividend Comparison

QTSSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, less than NWAUX's 5.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
NWAUX
Nationwide GQG US Quality Equity Fund
5.07%4.35%13.58%0.40%1.93%0.60%
QTSSX
Quantified Tactical Sectors Fund
0.39%0.45%0.00%6.30%0.19%3.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


QTSSX and NWAUX have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QTSSX has higher volatility (7.16%) compared to NWAUX (3.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QTSSX dropped -52.27% vs NWAUX's -21.07%.

QTSSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs 0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QTSSX and NWAUX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer