PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QTSSX vs. FTZIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QTSSX vs. FTZIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Quantified Tactical Sectors Fund (QTSSX) and Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Unconstrained Equity Fund (FTZIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QTSSX achieves a 13.11% return, which is significantly lower than FTZIX's 21.73% return.


QTSSX

1D
0.48%
1M
0.12%
YTD
13.11%
6M
10.18%
1Y
29.34%
3Y*
11.73%
5Y*
-3.55%
10Y*

FTZIX

1D
1.56%
1M
6.74%
YTD
21.73%
6M
19.33%
1Y
43.95%
3Y*
28.15%
5Y*
14.39%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QTSSX vs. FTZIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
QTSSX
Quantified Tactical Sectors Fund
13.11%4.10%13.88%13.97%-27.55%-16.61%
FTZIX
Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Unconstrained Equity Fund
21.73%22.63%25.31%27.18%-21.31%14.18%

Correlation

The correlation between QTSSX and FTZIX is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2021

0.68

The correlation between QTSSX and FTZIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QTSSX vs. FTZIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QTSSX
QTSSX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
QTSSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTSSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTSSX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
QTSSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTSSX Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

FTZIX
FTZIX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
FTZIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTZIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTZIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
FTZIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTZIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QTSSX vs. FTZIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Quantified Tactical Sectors Fund (QTSSX) and Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Unconstrained Equity Fund (FTZIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QTSSXFTZIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.43

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.57

4.85

-2.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.92

18.71

-11.79

QTSSX vs. FTZIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QTSSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is lower than the FTZIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QTSSX and FTZIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QTSSX vs. FTZIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QTSSX drawdown since its inception was -52.27%, which is greater than FTZIX's maximum drawdown of -37.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTSSX and FTZIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QTSSXFTZIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.27%

-37.22%

-15.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.53%

-9.03%

-2.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.77%

-18.65%

-6.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.20%

-29.53%

-19.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.55%

-0.01%

-21.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.68%

-6.46%

-29.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.28%

2.33%

+1.95%

Volatility

QTSSX vs. FTZIX - Volatility Comparison

Quantified Tactical Sectors Fund (QTSSX) has a higher volatility of 7.37% compared to Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Unconstrained Equity Fund (FTZIX) at 5.52%. This indicates that QTSSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTZIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QTSSXFTZIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.37%

5.52%

+1.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.18%

13.51%

+1.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.89%

16.81%

+4.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.25%

19.54%

+2.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.66%

22.33%

+1.33%

QTSSX vs. FTZIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QTSSX has a 1.56% expense ratio, which is higher than FTZIX's 1.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

QTSSX vs. FTZIX - Dividend Comparison

QTSSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.40%, more than FTZIX's 0.04% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
FTZIX
Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Unconstrained Equity Fund
0.04%0.05%0.11%0.19%0.00%0.00%0.26%0.76%
QTSSX
Quantified Tactical Sectors Fund
0.40%0.45%0.00%6.30%0.19%3.11%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QTSSX and FTZIX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QTSSX has higher volatility (7.37%) compared to FTZIX (5.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QTSSX dropped -52.27% vs FTZIX's -37.22%.

FTZIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QTSSX and FTZIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer