PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QTSSX vs. FSUVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QTSSX vs. FSUVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Quantified Tactical Sectors Fund (QTSSX) and Fidelity SAI U.S. Low Volatility Index Fund (FSUVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QTSSX achieves a 14.05% return, which is significantly higher than FSUVX's 8.73% return.


QTSSX

1D
1.32%
1M
-1.63%
6M
13.29%
YTD
14.05%
1Y
26.90%
3Y*
9.16%
5Y*
-0.65%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-1.31%

FSUVX

1D
0.00%
1M
1.14%
6M
6.39%
YTD
8.73%
1Y
14.88%
3Y*
14.07%
5Y*
9.11%
10Y*
11.13%
ALL TIME*
11.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

QTSSX vs. FSUVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
QTSSX
Quantified Tactical Sectors Fund
14.05%4.10%13.88%13.97%-27.55%-16.61%
FSUVX
Fidelity SAI U.S. Low Volatility Index Fund
8.73%11.03%17.40%14.80%-10.93%22.77%

Correlation

The correlation between QTSSX and FSUVX is 0.53, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2021

0.61

The correlation between QTSSX and FSUVX shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (1 year) to 0.64 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QTSSX vs. FSUVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QTSSX
QTSSX Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
QTSSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTSSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTSSX Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
QTSSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTSSX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

FSUVX
FSUVX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
FSUVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSUVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSUVX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
FSUVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSUVX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QTSSX vs. FSUVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Quantified Tactical Sectors Fund (QTSSX) and Fidelity SAI U.S. Low Volatility Index Fund (FSUVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QTSSXFSUVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.27

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.95

1.87

+0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.10

7.68

-2.58

QTSSX vs. FSUVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QTSSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is lower than the FSUVX Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QTSSX and FSUVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QTSSX vs. FSUVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QTSSX drawdown since its inception was -52.27%, which is greater than FSUVX's maximum drawdown of -32.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTSSX and FSUVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QTSSXFSUVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.27%

-32.41%

-19.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.53%

-7.28%

-4.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.77%

-11.55%

-13.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.13%

-19.48%

-25.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.90%

-0.68%

-20.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.40%

-3.25%

-32.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.39%

1.77%

+2.62%

Volatility

QTSSX vs. FSUVX - Volatility Comparison

Quantified Tactical Sectors Fund (QTSSX) has a higher volatility of 5.41% compared to Fidelity SAI U.S. Low Volatility Index Fund (FSUVX) at 3.36%. This indicates that QTSSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSUVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QTSSXFSUVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.41%

3.36%

+2.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.43%

7.10%

+8.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.47%

9.00%

+12.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.75%

13.00%

+8.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.60%

15.19%

+8.41%

QTSSX vs. FSUVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QTSSX has a 1.56% expense ratio, which is higher than FSUVX's 0.11% expense ratio.


Dividends

QTSSX vs. FSUVX - Dividend Comparison

QTSSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.40%, less than FSUVX's 4.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSUVX
Fidelity SAI U.S. Low Volatility Index Fund
4.09%4.45%2.25%1.74%4.12%3.52%1.31%3.80%2.63%2.94%2.23%1.17%
QTSSX
Quantified Tactical Sectors Fund
0.40%0.45%0.00%6.30%0.19%3.11%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QTSSX and FSUVX have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QTSSX has higher volatility (5.41%) compared to FSUVX (3.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QTSSX dropped -52.27% vs FSUVX's -32.41%.

FSUVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs 1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QTSSX and FSUVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer