PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QTPI vs. FPFD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QTPI vs. FPFD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in North Square RCIM Tax-Advantaged Preferred and Income Securities ETF (QTPI) and Fidelity Preferred Securities & Income ETF (FPFD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QTPI achieves a 0.84% return, which is significantly higher than FPFD's 0.73% return.


QTPI

1D
-0.59%
1M
0.10%
YTD
0.84%
6M
1.41%
1Y
5.09%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FPFD

1D
-0.23%
1M
-0.51%
YTD
0.73%
6M
0.81%
1Y
6.27%
3Y*
7.66%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QTPI vs. FPFD - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between QTPI and FPFD is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2024

0.50

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QTPI vs. FPFD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QTPI
QTPI Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
QTPI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTPI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTPI Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
QTPI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTPI Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

FPFD
FPFD Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
FPFD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FPFD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
FPFD Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
FPFD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
FPFD Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QTPI vs. FPFD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for North Square RCIM Tax-Advantaged Preferred and Income Securities ETF (QTPI) and Fidelity Preferred Securities & Income ETF (FPFD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QTPIFPFDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.42

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.42

2.29

+0.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.97

8.64

+1.33

QTPI vs. FPFD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QTPI Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is lower than the FPFD Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QTPI and FPFD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QTPIFPFDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.23

2.14

-0.90

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.19

0.33

+0.86

Drawdowns

QTPI vs. FPFD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QTPI drawdown since its inception was -4.08%, smaller than the maximum FPFD drawdown of -20.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTPI and FPFD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QTPIFPFDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.08%

-20.83%

+16.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.11%

-2.75%

+0.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.68%

-1.23%

+0.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.40%

-6.82%

+6.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.52%

0.73%

-0.21%

Volatility

QTPI vs. FPFD - Volatility Comparison

North Square RCIM Tax-Advantaged Preferred and Income Securities ETF (QTPI) has a higher volatility of 1.42% compared to Fidelity Preferred Securities & Income ETF (FPFD) at 1.00%. This indicates that QTPI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FPFD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QTPIFPFDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.42%

1.00%

+0.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.19%

2.24%

+0.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.55%

2.95%

+1.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.98%

5.32%

-0.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.98%

5.32%

-0.34%

QTPI vs. FPFD - Expense Ratio Comparison

QTPI has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than FPFD's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

QTPI vs. FPFD - Dividend Comparison

QTPI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.44%, less than FPFD's 5.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
FPFD
Fidelity Preferred Securities & Income ETF
5.15%5.04%4.89%5.09%5.22%1.59%
QTPI
North Square RCIM Tax-Advantaged Preferred and Income Securities ETF
4.44%4.58%0.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QTPI and FPFD have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QTPI has higher volatility (1.42%) compared to FPFD (1.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QTPI dropped -4.08% vs FPFD's -20.83%.

On 1-year performance, FPFD leads with 6.27% vs 5.09% for QTPI. On fees, FPFD is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, FPFD has been the lower-risk option at 1.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FPFD has performed better with a 6.27% return vs 5.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FPFD is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QTPI.

FPFD has the higher dividend yield at 5.15%, compared with 4.44% for QTPI.

They also come from different issuers: North Square and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for QTPI and 0.59% for FPFD.

FPFD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QTPI and FPFD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer