QTPI vs. BAMU

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

QTPI (North Square RCIM Tax-Advantaged Preferred and Income Securities ETF) and BAMU (Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QTPI is a Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds fund actively managed by North Square, while BAMU is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Brookstone. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, QTPI returned 6.12% vs 2.95% for BAMU. At a correlation of -0.09, they often move in opposite directions. QTPI charges 0.60%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for BAMU.

Performance

QTPI vs. BAMU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in North Square RCIM Tax-Advantaged Preferred and Income Securities ETF (QTPI) and Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QTPI achieves a 1.16% return, which is significantly higher than BAMU's 1.08% return.

QTPI

• 1D: 0.31%
• 1M: -0.02%
• YTD: 1.16%
• 6M: 1.94%
• 1Y: 6.12%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BAMU

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.22%
• YTD: 1.08%
• 6M: 1.31%
• 1Y: 2.95%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QTPI vs. BAMU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
QTPI North Square RCIM Tax-Advantaged Preferred and Income Securities ETF	1.16%	7.37%	0.34%
BAMU Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF	1.08%	3.21%	0.19%

Correlation

The correlation between QTPI and BAMU is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.13
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2024	-0.09

Return for Risk

QTPI vs. BAMU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QTPI

QTPI Risk / Return Rank: 51
QTPI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
QTPI Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
QTPI Omega Ratio Rank: 42
QTPI Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
QTPI Martin Ratio Rank: 66

BAMU

BAMU Risk / Return Rank: 98
BAMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
BAMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
BAMU Omega Ratio Rank: 98
BAMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
BAMU Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QTPI vs. BAMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for North Square RCIM Tax-Advantaged Preferred and Income Securities ETF (QTPI) and Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QTPI	BAMU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.50	5.01	-3.52
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.21	8.83	-6.62
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	2.42	-1.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.91	25.06	-22.15
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.96	98.57	-86.61
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QTPI vs. BAMU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QTPI Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is lower than the BAMU Sharpe Ratio of 5.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QTPI and BAMU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QTPI	BAMU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.50	5.01	-3.52
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.24	4.15	-2.91

Drawdowns

QTPI vs. BAMU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QTPI drawdown since its inception was -4.08%, which is greater than BAMU's maximum drawdown of -0.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTPI and BAMU.

Drawdown Indicators

	QTPI	BAMU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.08%	-0.36%	-3.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.11%	-0.12%	-1.99%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.36%	0.00%	-0.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.40%	-0.02%	-0.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.51%	0.03%	+0.48%

Volatility

QTPI vs. BAMU - Volatility Comparison

North Square RCIM Tax-Advantaged Preferred and Income Securities ETF (QTPI) has a higher volatility of 1.39% compared to Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU) at 0.07%. This indicates that QTPI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAMU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QTPI	BAMU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.39%	0.07%	+1.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.16%	0.43%	+2.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.16%	0.59%	+3.57%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.98%	0.87%	+4.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.98%	0.87%	+4.11%

QTPI vs. BAMU - Expense Ratio Comparison

QTPI has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than BAMU's 1.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

QTPI vs. BAMU - Dividend Comparison

QTPI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.43%, more than BAMU's 3.06% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BAMU Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF	3.06%	3.20%	3.97%	0.84%
QTPI North Square RCIM Tax-Advantaged Preferred and Income Securities ETF	4.43%	4.58%	0.10%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QTPI and BAMU in my portfolio?

QTPI and BAMU have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QTPI or BAMU?

QTPI has higher volatility (1.39%) compared to BAMU (0.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QTPI dropped -4.08% vs BAMU's -0.36%.

Which ETF is better, QTPI or BAMU?

On 1-year performance, QTPI leads with 6.12% vs 2.95% for BAMU. On fees, QTPI is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, BAMU has been the lower-risk option at 0.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QTPI or BAMU?

Over the 1-year period, QTPI has performed better with a 6.12% return vs 2.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QTPI or BAMU?

QTPI is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for BAMU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QTPI or BAMU?

QTPI has the higher dividend yield at 4.43%, compared with 3.06% for BAMU.

What is the main difference between QTPI and BAMU?

QTPI is categorized as Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds, while BAMU is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: North Square and Brookstone. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for QTPI and 1.09% for BAMU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BAMU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.01 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.