QTOP vs. USFR
QTOP (iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF) and USFR (WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - QTOP is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq-100 Top 30 Index, while USFR is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, QTOP returned 38.12% vs 3.99% for USFR. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. QTOP charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for USFR.
Performance
QTOP vs. USFR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QTOP achieves a 17.15% return, which is significantly higher than USFR's 1.82% return.
QTOP
- 1D
- -3.69%
- 1M
- -1.41%
- YTD
- 17.15%
- 6M
- 15.48%
- 1Y
- 38.12%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
USFR
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.33%
- YTD
- 1.82%
- 6M
- 1.92%
- 1Y
- 3.99%
- 3Y*
- 4.74%
- 5Y*
- 3.71%
- 10Y*
- 2.43%
QTOP vs. USFR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
QTOP iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF | 17.15% | 22.19% | 6.25% |
USFR WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund | 1.82% | 4.23% | 1.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between QTOP and USFR is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2024 | -0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QTOP vs. USFR — Risk / Return Rank
QTOP
USFR
QTOP vs. USFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF (QTOP) and WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QTOP | USFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -12.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -47.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 13.31 | -11.96 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.97 | 201.33 | -198.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.59 | 779.76 | -769.18 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QTOP vs. USFR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QTOP drawdown since its inception was -23.28%, which is greater than USFR's maximum drawdown of -1.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTOP and USFR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QTOP | USFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.28% | -1.36% | -21.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.88% | -0.02% | -12.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -0.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -0.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -0.80% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.74% | 0.00% | -4.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.80% | -0.15% | -3.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.61% | 0.01% | +3.60% |
Volatility
QTOP vs. USFR - Volatility Comparison
iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF (QTOP) has a higher volatility of 9.71% compared to WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR) at 0.09%. This indicates that QTOP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QTOP | USFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.71% | 0.09% | +9.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.00% | 0.19% | +15.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.50% | 0.27% | +19.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.44% | 0.40% | +23.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.44% | 0.78% | +22.66% |
QTOP vs. USFR - Expense Ratio Comparison
QTOP has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than USFR's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
QTOP vs. USFR - Dividend Comparison
QTOP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, less than USFR's 3.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QTOP iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF | 0.33% | 0.38% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
USFR WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund | 3.90% | 4.15% | 5.17% | 5.12% | 1.78% | 0.01% | 0.40% | 2.08% | 1.67% | 1.03% | 0.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QTOP and USFR have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QTOP has higher volatility (9.71%) compared to USFR (0.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QTOP dropped -23.28% vs USFR's -1.36%.
On 1-year performance, QTOP leads with 38.12% vs 3.99% for USFR. On fees, USFR is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, USFR has been the lower-risk option at 0.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, QTOP has performed better with a 38.12% return vs 3.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
USFR is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for QTOP.
USFR has the higher dividend yield at 3.90%, compared with 0.33% for QTOP.
QTOP is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while USFR is Government Bonds. QTOP tracks Nasdaq-100 Top 30 Index, while USFR tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for QTOP and 0.15% for USFR.
USFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (14.67 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QTOP and USFR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer