QTOP vs. IWM
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF (QTOP) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM).
QTOP and IWM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QTOP is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq-100 Top 30 Index. It was launched on Oct 23, 2024. IWM is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell 2000 Index. It was launched on May 22, 2000. Both QTOP and IWM are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
QTOP vs. IWM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
QTOP vs. IWM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
QTOP iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF | -6.23% | 22.19% | 5.80% |
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | 0.93% | 12.66% | 0.86% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QTOP achieves a -6.23% return, which is significantly lower than IWM's 0.93% return.
QTOP
- 1D
- 3.75%
- 1M
- -4.25%
- YTD
- -6.23%
- 6M
- -3.51%
- 1Y
- 26.70%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IWM
- 1D
- 3.50%
- 1M
- -4.96%
- YTD
- 0.93%
- 6M
- 3.02%
- 1Y
- 25.66%
- 3Y*
- 12.94%
- 5Y*
- 3.34%
- 10Y*
- 9.76%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QTOP vs. IWM - Expense Ratio Comparison
QTOP has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than IWM's 0.19% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
QTOP vs. IWM — Risk / Return Rank
QTOP
IWM
QTOP vs. IWM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF (QTOP) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QTOP | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.14 | 1.11 | +0.03 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.74 | 1.66 | +0.08 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.21 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.07 | 1.82 | +0.25 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.14 | 6.76 | +0.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QTOP | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.14 | 1.11 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.15 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.43 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.34 | +0.29 |
Correlation
The correlation between QTOP and IWM is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
QTOP vs. IWM - Dividend Comparison
QTOP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%, less than IWM's 1.02% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QTOP iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF | 0.42% | 0.38% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | 1.02% | 1.04% | 1.15% | 1.35% | 1.48% | 0.94% | 1.04% | 1.26% | 1.40% | 1.26% | 1.38% | 1.54% |
Drawdowns
QTOP vs. IWM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QTOP drawdown since its inception was -23.28%, smaller than the maximum IWM drawdown of -59.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTOP and IWM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| QTOP | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.28% | -59.05% | +35.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.88% | -13.74% | +0.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -31.91% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.13% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.61% | -7.91% | -1.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.11% | -10.83% | +6.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.74% | 3.70% | +0.04% |
Volatility
QTOP vs. IWM - Volatility Comparison
iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF (QTOP) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) have volatilities of 7.13% and 7.47%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| QTOP | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.13% | 7.47% | -0.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.85% | 14.47% | -0.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.49% | 23.18% | +0.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.12% | 22.55% | +0.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.12% | 22.99% | +0.13% |