PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QTOP vs. BIBL
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QTOP vs. BIBL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF (QTOP) and Inspire 100 ETF (BIBL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

QTOP vs. BIBL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
QTOP
iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF
-4.91%22.19%5.80%
BIBL
Inspire 100 ETF
6.10%17.27%-3.03%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QTOP achieves a -4.91% return, which is significantly lower than BIBL's 6.10% return.


QTOP

1D
1.40%
1M
-3.16%
YTD
-4.91%
6M
-2.53%
1Y
27.45%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BIBL

1D
1.12%
1M
-4.41%
YTD
6.10%
6M
7.52%
1Y
25.37%
3Y*
16.16%
5Y*
8.37%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QTOP vs. BIBL - Expense Ratio Comparison

QTOP has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than BIBL's 0.35% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

QTOP vs. BIBL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QTOP
QTOP Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
QTOP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTOP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTOP Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
QTOP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTOP Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

BIBL
BIBL Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
BIBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIBL Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
BIBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIBL Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QTOP vs. BIBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF (QTOP) and Inspire 100 ETF (BIBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QTOPBIBLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.17

1.25

-0.08

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.78

1.78

0.00

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.26

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.21

1.84

+0.37

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.54

8.69

-1.15

QTOP vs. BIBL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QTOP Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is comparable to the BIBL Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QTOP and BIBL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QTOPBIBLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.17

1.25

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

0.54

+0.14

Correlation

The correlation between QTOP and BIBL is 0.70, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

QTOP vs. BIBL - Dividend Comparison

QTOP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%, less than BIBL's 1.11% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
QTOP
iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF
0.41%0.38%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BIBL
Inspire 100 ETF
1.11%1.01%0.92%1.02%0.98%17.87%1.67%1.30%1.49%0.31%

Drawdowns

QTOP vs. BIBL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QTOP drawdown since its inception was -23.28%, smaller than the maximum BIBL drawdown of -36.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTOP and BIBL.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


QTOPBIBLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.28%

-36.12%

+12.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.88%

-13.93%

+1.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.35%

-4.96%

-3.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.12%

-7.17%

+3.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.78%

2.95%

+0.83%

Volatility

QTOP vs. BIBL - Volatility Comparison

iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF (QTOP) has a higher volatility of 7.24% compared to Inspire 100 ETF (BIBL) at 6.82%. This indicates that QTOP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


QTOPBIBLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.24%

6.82%

+0.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.92%

12.28%

+1.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.53%

20.39%

+3.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.11%

19.44%

+3.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.11%

21.15%

+1.96%