QTOC vs. NVDY
QTOC (Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - October) and NVDY (YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QTOC is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Innovator, while NVDY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, QTOC returned 19.15%/yr vs 54.54%/yr for NVDY. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QTOC charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for NVDY.
Performance
QTOC vs. NVDY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QTOC achieves a 10.79% return, which is significantly lower than NVDY's 13.06% return.
QTOC
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 3.29%
- YTD
- 10.79%
- 6M
- 10.99%
- 1Y
- 22.99%
- 3Y*
- 19.15%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NVDY
- 1D
- -2.22%
- 1M
- 5.54%
- YTD
- 13.06%
- 6M
- 17.67%
- 1Y
- 46.64%
- 3Y*
- 54.54%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QTOC vs. NVDY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QTOC Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - October | 10.79% | 16.79% | 14.90% | 16.77% |
NVDY YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF | 13.06% | 27.38% | 114.23% | 42.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between QTOC and NVDY is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2023 | 0.59 |
The correlation between QTOC and NVDY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QTOC vs. NVDY — Risk / Return Rank
QTOC
NVDY
QTOC vs. NVDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - October (QTOC) and YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF (NVDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QTOC | NVDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.29 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.40 | 3.66 | -1.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.68 | 9.00 | +2.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QTOC | NVDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.85 | 1.72 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 1.64 | -1.14 |
Drawdowns
QTOC vs. NVDY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QTOC drawdown since its inception was -33.43%, roughly equal to the maximum NVDY drawdown of -34.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTOC and NVDY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QTOC | NVDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.43% | -34.08% | +0.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.63% | -12.81% | +3.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.24% | -34.08% | +12.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.16% | -6.66% | +6.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.50% | -6.15% | -2.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.97% | 5.20% | -3.23% |
Volatility
QTOC vs. NVDY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - October (QTOC) is 1.26%, while YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF (NVDY) has a volatility of 9.46%. This indicates that QTOC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QTOC | NVDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.26% | 9.46% | -8.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.34% | 20.68% | -10.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.49% | 27.35% | -14.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.77% | 38.24% | -18.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.77% | 38.24% | -18.47% |
QTOC vs. NVDY - Expense Ratio Comparison
QTOC has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than NVDY's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
QTOC vs. NVDY - Dividend Comparison
QTOC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 61.36%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
NVDY YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF | 61.36% | 83.10% | 83.65% | 22.32% |
QTOC Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - October | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QTOC and NVDY have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NVDY has higher volatility (9.46%) compared to QTOC (1.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QTOC dropped -33.43% vs NVDY's -34.08%.
On 3-year performance, NVDY leads with 54.54% vs 19.15% for QTOC. On fees, QTOC is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, QTOC has been the lower-risk option at 1.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, NVDY has performed better with a 54.54% return vs 19.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QTOC is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for NVDY.
NVDY has the higher dividend yield at 61.36%, compared with 0.00% for QTOC.
QTOC is categorized as Options Trading, while NVDY is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for QTOC and 0.99% for NVDY.
QTOC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QTOC and NVDY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer