QTOC vs. IWMY

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

QTOC (Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - October) and IWMY (Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF) are both Options Trading funds. QTOC is actively managed, while IWMY is passively managed. Over the past year, QTOC returned 18.87% vs 21.49% for IWMY. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QTOC charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for IWMY.

Performance

QTOC vs. IWMY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - October (QTOC) and Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (IWMY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QTOC achieves a 9.53% return, which is significantly lower than IWMY's 15.11% return.

QTOC

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: -0.37%
• YTD: 9.53%
• 6M: 8.58%
• 1Y: 18.87%
• 3Y*: 18.31%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IWMY

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: 3.51%
• YTD: 15.11%
• 6M: 12.53%
• 1Y: 21.49%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QTOC vs. IWMY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
QTOC Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - October	9.53%	16.79%	14.90%	12.39%
IWMY Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF	15.11%	10.18%	5.56%	10.06%

Correlation

The correlation between QTOC and IWMY is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.65
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2023	0.63

The correlation between QTOC and IWMY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

QTOC vs. IWMY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QTOC

QTOC Risk / Return Rank: 53
QTOC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
QTOC Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
QTOC Omega Ratio Rank: 58
QTOC Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
QTOC Martin Ratio Rank: 61

IWMY

IWMY Risk / Return Rank: 40
IWMY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
IWMY Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
IWMY Omega Ratio Rank: 38
IWMY Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
IWMY Martin Ratio Rank: 41

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QTOC vs. IWMY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - October (QTOC) and Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (IWMY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QTOC	IWMY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.50	1.32	+0.18
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.19	1.82	+0.37
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.23	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.97	1.87	+0.10
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.51	6.09	+3.42

QTOC vs. IWMY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QTOC Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is comparable to the IWMY Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QTOC and IWMY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QTOC vs. IWMY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QTOC drawdown since its inception was -33.43%, which is greater than IWMY's maximum drawdown of -18.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTOC and IWMY.

Drawdown Indicators

	QTOC	IWMY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.43%	-18.72%	-14.71%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.63%	-11.57%	+1.94%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.24%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.43%	-0.65%	-0.78%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.40%	-2.94%	-5.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.99%	3.54%	-1.55%

Volatility

QTOC vs. IWMY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - October (QTOC) is 3.07%, while Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (IWMY) has a volatility of 6.15%. This indicates that QTOC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWMY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QTOC	IWMY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.07%	6.15%	-3.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.42%	13.54%	-3.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.64%	16.36%	-3.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.69%	15.93%	+3.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.69%	15.93%	+3.76%

QTOC vs. IWMY - Expense Ratio Comparison

QTOC has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than IWMY's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

QTOC vs. IWMY - Dividend Comparison

QTOC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IWMY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 43.68%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
IWMY Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF	43.68%	63.33%	107.92%	11.34%
QTOC Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - October	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QTOC and IWMY in my portfolio?

QTOC and IWMY have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QTOC or IWMY?

IWMY has higher volatility (6.15%) compared to QTOC (3.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QTOC dropped -33.43% vs IWMY's -18.72%.

Which ETF is better, QTOC or IWMY?

On 1-year performance, IWMY leads with 21.49% vs 18.87% for QTOC. On fees, QTOC is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, QTOC has been the lower-risk option at 3.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QTOC or IWMY?

Over the 1-year period, IWMY has performed better with a 21.49% return vs 18.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QTOC or IWMY?

QTOC is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for IWMY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QTOC or IWMY?

IWMY has the higher dividend yield at 43.68%, compared with 0.00% for QTOC.

What is the main difference between QTOC and IWMY?

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for QTOC and 0.99% for IWMY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QTOC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.