QTOC vs. HOCT
QTOC (Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - October) and HOCT (Innovator Premium Income 9 Buffer ETF - October) are both Options Trading funds from Innovator. Both are actively managed. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.
Performance
QTOC vs. HOCT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
QTOC
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 3.29%
- YTD
- 10.79%
- 6M
- 10.99%
- 1Y
- 22.99%
- 3Y*
- 19.15%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HOCT
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QTOC vs. HOCT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
QTOC Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - October | 11.07% |
HOCT Innovator Premium Income 9 Buffer ETF - October | 0.00% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QTOC vs. HOCT — Risk / Return Rank
QTOC
HOCT
QTOC vs. HOCT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - October (QTOC) and Innovator Premium Income 9 Buffer ETF - October (HOCT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QTOC | HOCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.40 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.68 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QTOC | HOCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.85 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | — | — |
Drawdowns
QTOC vs. HOCT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QTOC drawdown since its inception was -33.43%, which is greater than HOCT's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTOC and HOCT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QTOC | HOCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.43% | 0.00% | -33.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.63% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.24% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.16% | 0.00% | -0.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.50% | 0.00% | -8.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.97% | — | — |
Volatility
QTOC vs. HOCT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QTOC | HOCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.26% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.34% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.49% | 0.00% | +12.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.77% | 0.00% | +19.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.77% | 0.00% | +19.77% |
QTOC vs. HOCT - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both QTOC and HOCT have an expense ratio of 0.79%.
Dividends
QTOC vs. HOCT - Dividend Comparison
Neither QTOC nor HOCT has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QTOC and HOCT have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.
QTOC and HOCT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
Find the right allocation for QTOC and HOCT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer