PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QTERX vs. QSPIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QTERX vs. QSPIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AQR Emerging Multi-Style II Fund Class R6 (QTERX) and AQR Style Premia Alternative Fund (QSPIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QTERX achieves a 20.98% return, which is significantly higher than QSPIX's 13.06% return. Over the past 10 years, QTERX has outperformed QSPIX with an annualized return of 9.74%, while QSPIX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.33% annualized return.


QTERX

1D
1.68%
1M
-6.53%
6M
14.39%
YTD
20.98%
1Y
36.63%
3Y*
23.07%
5Y*
8.49%
10Y*
9.74%

QSPIX

1D
0.72%
1M
-0.31%
6M
14.79%
YTD
13.06%
1Y
20.90%
3Y*
19.57%
5Y*
19.16%
10Y*
7.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QTERX vs. QSPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QTERX
AQR Emerging Multi-Style II Fund Class R6
20.98%32.94%12.02%12.66%-21.13%0.95%17.08%16.87%-16.22%37.22%
QSPIX
AQR Style Premia Alternative Fund
13.06%14.82%21.48%12.46%30.76%24.93%-21.96%-8.22%-12.35%12.12%

Correlation

The correlation between QTERX and QSPIX is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

-0.05

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QTERX vs. QSPIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QTERX
QTERX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
QTERX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTERX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTERX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
QTERX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTERX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

QSPIX
QSPIX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
QSPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QSPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
QSPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
QSPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
QSPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QTERX vs. QSPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR Emerging Multi-Style II Fund Class R6 (QTERX) and AQR Style Premia Alternative Fund (QSPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QTERXQSPIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.36

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.82

3.92

-1.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.65

10.72

-1.07

QTERX vs. QSPIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QTERX Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is comparable to the QSPIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QTERX and QSPIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QTERX vs. QSPIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QTERX drawdown since its inception was -39.15%, smaller than the maximum QSPIX drawdown of -41.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTERX and QSPIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QTERXQSPIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.15%

-41.37%

+2.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.32%

-5.09%

-8.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.89%

-9.31%

-7.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.84%

-17.13%

-17.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.15%

-41.37%

+2.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.79%

-0.81%

-6.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.96%

-9.35%

-2.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.88%

1.87%

+2.01%

Volatility

QTERX vs. QSPIX - Volatility Comparison

AQR Emerging Multi-Style II Fund Class R6 (QTERX) has a higher volatility of 10.44% compared to AQR Style Premia Alternative Fund (QSPIX) at 2.67%. This indicates that QTERX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QSPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QTERXQSPIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.44%

2.67%

+7.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.93%

7.10%

+12.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.87%

9.70%

+12.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.95%

15.84%

+2.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.20%

12.84%

+5.36%

QTERX vs. QSPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QTERX has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is lower than QSPIX's 1.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

QTERX vs. QSPIX - Dividend Comparison

QTERX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.51%, more than QSPIX's 2.27% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QSPIX
AQR Style Premia Alternative Fund
2.27%2.57%6.95%23.77%22.68%12.78%0.00%1.62%0.96%7.08%1.74%5.83%
QTERX
AQR Emerging Multi-Style II Fund Class R6
3.51%4.25%4.91%5.76%4.73%2.53%1.68%4.48%2.40%1.63%2.57%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QTERX and QSPIX have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QTERX has higher volatility (10.44%) compared to QSPIX (2.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QTERX dropped -39.15% vs QSPIX's -41.37%.

QSPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QTERX and QSPIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer