PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QTERX vs. ESCIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QTERX vs. ESCIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AQR Emerging Multi-Style II Fund Class R6 (QTERX) and Ashmore Emerging Markets Small Cap Equity Fund (ESCIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QTERX achieves a 29.67% return, which is significantly higher than ESCIX's 8.91% return. Over the past 10 years, QTERX has outperformed ESCIX with an annualized return of 11.14%, while ESCIX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.82% annualized return.


QTERX

1D
-0.82%
1M
6.17%
YTD
29.67%
6M
33.06%
1Y
56.18%
3Y*
28.16%
5Y*
9.23%
10Y*
11.14%

ESCIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
8.91%
6M
11.19%
1Y
27.05%
3Y*
15.58%
5Y*
4.88%
10Y*
9.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QTERX vs. ESCIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QTERX
AQR Emerging Multi-Style II Fund Class R6
29.67%32.94%12.02%12.66%-21.13%0.95%17.08%16.87%-16.22%37.22%
ESCIX
Ashmore Emerging Markets Small Cap Equity Fund
8.91%26.07%3.55%19.64%-24.45%11.93%43.41%15.24%-22.01%28.57%

Correlation

The correlation between QTERX and ESCIX is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.75

Over the past year, the correlation between QTERX and ESCIX has dropped to 0.52 - well below their long-term average of 0.75, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QTERX vs. ESCIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QTERX
QTERX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
QTERX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTERX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTERX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
QTERX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTERX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

ESCIX
ESCIX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
ESCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
ESCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QTERX vs. ESCIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR Emerging Multi-Style II Fund Class R6 (QTERX) and Ashmore Emerging Markets Small Cap Equity Fund (ESCIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QTERXESCIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.60

1.56

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.37

5.26

-0.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.07

19.21

-2.14

QTERX vs. ESCIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QTERX Sharpe Ratio is 3.24, which is comparable to the ESCIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QTERX and ESCIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QTERXESCIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.24

2.60

+0.64

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.32

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

0.56

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

0.39

+0.24

Drawdowns

QTERX vs. ESCIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QTERX drawdown since its inception was -39.15%, smaller than the maximum ESCIX drawdown of -48.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTERX and ESCIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QTERXESCIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.15%

-48.76%

+9.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.32%

-5.70%

-7.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.89%

-19.97%

+3.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.30%

-36.59%

-0.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.15%

-48.76%

+9.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.82%

-0.74%

-0.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.04%

-13.32%

+1.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.40%

1.52%

+1.88%

Volatility

QTERX vs. ESCIX - Volatility Comparison

AQR Emerging Multi-Style II Fund Class R6 (QTERX) has a higher volatility of 7.86% compared to Ashmore Emerging Markets Small Cap Equity Fund (ESCIX) at 0.00%. This indicates that QTERX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ESCIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QTERXESCIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.86%

0.00%

+7.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.35%

7.36%

+7.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.96%

11.53%

+6.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.07%

15.66%

+1.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.90%

17.60%

+0.30%

QTERX vs. ESCIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QTERX has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is lower than ESCIX's 1.52% expense ratio.


Dividends

QTERX vs. ESCIX - Dividend Comparison

QTERX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.27%, more than ESCIX's 0.42% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
ESCIX
Ashmore Emerging Markets Small Cap Equity Fund
0.42%0.91%0.00%0.56%0.60%0.00%0.00%0.13%0.11%1.66%1.16%
QTERX
AQR Emerging Multi-Style II Fund Class R6
3.27%4.25%4.91%5.76%4.73%2.53%1.68%4.48%2.40%1.63%2.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


QTERX and ESCIX have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QTERX has higher volatility (7.86%) compared to ESCIX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QTERX dropped -39.15% vs ESCIX's -48.76%.

QTERX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.24 vs 2.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QTERX and ESCIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer