PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QTERX vs. AMOMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QTERX vs. AMOMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AQR Emerging Multi-Style II Fund Class R6 (QTERX) and AQR Large Cap Momentum Style Fund (AMOMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


QTERX

1D
-0.82%
1M
6.17%
YTD
29.67%
6M
33.06%
1Y
56.18%
3Y*
28.16%
5Y*
9.23%
10Y*
11.14%

AMOMX

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QTERX vs. AMOMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QTERX
AQR Emerging Multi-Style II Fund Class R6
29.67%32.94%12.02%12.66%-21.13%0.95%17.08%16.87%-16.22%37.22%
AMOMX
AQR Large Cap Momentum Style Fund
11.26%15.36%27.62%18.17%-18.00%26.01%26.86%29.20%-4.01%23.87%

Correlation

The correlation between QTERX and AMOMX is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.64

The correlation between QTERX and AMOMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QTERX vs. AMOMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QTERX
QTERX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
QTERX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTERX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTERX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
QTERX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTERX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

AMOMX
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QTERX vs. AMOMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR Emerging Multi-Style II Fund Class R6 (QTERX) and AQR Large Cap Momentum Style Fund (AMOMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QTERXAMOMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.60

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.07

QTERX vs. AMOMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QTERXAMOMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

Drawdowns

QTERX vs. AMOMX - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QTERXAMOMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.40%

Volatility

QTERX vs. AMOMX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QTERXAMOMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.90%

QTERX vs. AMOMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QTERX has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is higher than AMOMX's 0.41% expense ratio.


Dividends

QTERX vs. AMOMX - Dividend Comparison

QTERX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.27%, less than AMOMX's 30.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMOMX
AQR Large Cap Momentum Style Fund
30.65%25.49%14.05%14.08%10.95%17.95%16.14%10.22%12.17%9.15%8.23%8.44%
QTERX
AQR Emerging Multi-Style II Fund Class R6
3.27%4.25%4.91%5.76%4.73%2.53%1.68%4.48%2.40%1.63%2.57%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QTERX and AMOMX have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QTERX and AMOMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer