QSTFX vs. PFTEX
QSTFX (Quantified STF Fund) and PFTEX (PFG Meeder Tactical Strategy Fund) are both Tactical Allocation funds. Over the past 5 years, QSTFX returned 7.08%/yr vs 6.92%/yr for PFTEX. Their 0.67 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. QSTFX charges 1.55%/yr vs 2.05%/yr for PFTEX.
Performance
QSTFX vs. PFTEX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QSTFX achieves a 13.27% return, which is significantly higher than PFTEX's 9.13% return.
QSTFX
- 1D
- 3.29%
- 1M
- -6.86%
- 6M
- 10.75%
- YTD
- 13.27%
- 1Y
- 23.74%
- 3Y*
- 13.99%
- 5Y*
- 7.08%
- 10Y*
- 17.63%
- ALL TIME*
- 14.83%
PFTEX
- 1D
- 1.76%
- 1M
- 0.26%
- 6M
- 6.14%
- YTD
- 9.13%
- 1Y
- 19.26%
- 3Y*
- 12.60%
- 5Y*
- 6.92%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 5.95%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
QSTFX Quantified STF Fund | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
QSTFX vs. PFTEX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QSTFX Quantified STF Fund | 13.27% | -2.48% | 29.94% | 61.87% | -46.15% | 28.79% | 78.20% | 16.43% | -6.86% | -1.54% |
PFTEX PFG Meeder Tactical Strategy Fund | 9.13% | 13.11% | 13.02% | 12.53% | -13.13% | 11.68% | 3.04% | 9.96% | -5.02% | 0.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between QSTFX and PFTEX is 0.69, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 2017 | 0.67 |
The correlation between QSTFX and PFTEX shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (5 years) to 0.72 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QSTFX vs. PFTEX — Risk / Return Rank
QSTFX
PFTEX
QSTFX vs. PFTEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Quantified STF Fund (QSTFX) and PFG Meeder Tactical Strategy Fund (PFTEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QSTFX | PFTEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.27 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.24 | 1.99 | -0.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.01 | 8.69 | -5.69 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QSTFX vs. PFTEX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QSTFX drawdown since its inception was -49.03%, which is greater than PFTEX's maximum drawdown of -19.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QSTFX and PFTEX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QSTFX | PFTEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.03% | -19.72% | -29.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.87% | -8.88% | -8.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.22% | -15.53% | -16.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.03% | -17.99% | -31.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.03% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.16% | -0.69% | -10.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.32% | -5.32% | -10.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.33% | 2.02% | +5.31% |
Volatility
QSTFX vs. PFTEX - Volatility Comparison
Quantified STF Fund (QSTFX) has a higher volatility of 11.74% compared to PFG Meeder Tactical Strategy Fund (PFTEX) at 3.23%. This indicates that QSTFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PFTEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QSTFX | PFTEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.74% | 3.23% | +8.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.25% | 9.44% | +11.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.04% | 11.88% | +16.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.60% | 16.11% | +11.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.22% | 14.52% | +13.70% |
QSTFX vs. PFTEX - Expense Ratio Comparison
QSTFX has a 1.55% expense ratio, which is lower than PFTEX's 2.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
QSTFX vs. PFTEX - Dividend Comparison
QSTFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.40%, more than PFTEX's 8.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFTEX PFG Meeder Tactical Strategy Fund | 8.66% | 9.45% | 3.38% | 2.23% | 18.46% | 2.00% | 1.00% | 0.15% | 0.18% | 0.13% | 0.00% |
QSTFX Quantified STF Fund | 9.40% | 10.65% | 5.12% | 1.03% | 0.00% | 21.93% | 20.82% | 0.52% | 2.57% | 39.11% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QSTFX and PFTEX have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QSTFX has higher volatility (11.74%) compared to PFTEX (3.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QSTFX dropped -49.03% vs PFTEX's -19.72%.
PFTEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QSTFX and PFTEX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer