PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PFTEX vs. PFFSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PFTEX vs. PFFSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PFG Meeder Tactical Strategy Fund (PFTEX) and PFG Sector Equity Business Cycle Strategy Fund (PFFSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFTEX achieves a 9.60% return, which is significantly lower than PFFSX's 14.00% return.


PFTEX

1D
0.17%
1M
3.84%
YTD
9.60%
6M
10.33%
1Y
23.49%
3Y*
14.63%
5Y*
7.31%
10Y*

PFFSX

1D
0.19%
1M
4.88%
YTD
14.00%
6M
14.94%
1Y
30.90%
3Y*
23.34%
5Y*
15.44%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PFTEX vs. PFFSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
PFTEX
PFG Meeder Tactical Strategy Fund
9.60%13.11%13.02%12.53%-13.13%11.68%17.45%
PFFSX
PFG Sector Equity Business Cycle Strategy Fund
14.00%16.17%30.14%18.01%-11.57%26.30%24.12%

Correlation

The correlation between PFTEX and PFFSX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2020

0.92

The correlation between PFTEX and PFFSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PFTEX vs. PFFSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFTEX
PFTEX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
PFTEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFTEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFTEX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
PFTEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFTEX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

PFFSX
PFFSX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
PFFSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFFSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFFSX Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
PFFSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFFSX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFTEX vs. PFFSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PFG Meeder Tactical Strategy Fund (PFTEX) and PFG Sector Equity Business Cycle Strategy Fund (PFFSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PFTEXPFFSXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.20

2.36

-0.16

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.08

3.17

-0.09

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.42

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.70

3.10

-0.40

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.25

13.33

-1.08

PFTEX vs. PFFSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFTEX Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is comparable to the PFFSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFTEX and PFFSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PFTEXPFFSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.20

2.36

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

0.83

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.99

-0.57

Drawdowns

PFTEX vs. PFFSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFTEX drawdown since its inception was -19.72%, smaller than the maximum PFFSX drawdown of -24.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFTEX and PFFSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PFTEXPFFSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.72%

-24.92%

+5.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.88%

-10.11%

+1.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.53%

-21.45%

+5.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.99%

-24.92%

+6.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.13%

+0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.40%

-5.98%

+0.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.96%

2.35%

-0.39%

Volatility

PFTEX vs. PFFSX - Volatility Comparison

PFG Meeder Tactical Strategy Fund (PFTEX) has a higher volatility of 3.05% compared to PFG Sector Equity Business Cycle Strategy Fund (PFFSX) at 2.68%. This indicates that PFTEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PFFSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PFTEXPFFSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.05%

2.68%

+0.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.53%

9.93%

-1.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.02%

13.41%

-2.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.98%

18.77%

-2.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.54%

18.80%

-4.26%

PFTEX vs. PFFSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PFTEX has a 2.05% expense ratio, which is higher than PFFSX's 2.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

PFTEX vs. PFFSX - Dividend Comparison

PFTEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.62%, less than PFFSX's 15.08% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
PFFSX
PFG Sector Equity Business Cycle Strategy Fund
15.08%17.19%19.78%2.40%10.90%6.73%5.51%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PFTEX
PFG Meeder Tactical Strategy Fund
8.62%9.45%3.38%2.23%18.46%2.00%1.00%0.15%0.18%0.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, PFTEX and PFFSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PFTEX has higher volatility (3.05%) compared to PFFSX (2.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFTEX dropped -19.72% vs PFFSX's -24.92%.

PFFSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PFTEX and PFFSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer