PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PFTEX vs. PFFSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PFTEX vs. PFFSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PFG Meeder Tactical Strategy Fund (PFTEX) and PFG Sector Equity Business Cycle Strategy Fund (PFFSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFTEX achieves a 9.13% return, which is significantly lower than PFFSX's 11.64% return.


PFTEX

1D
1.76%
1M
0.26%
6M
6.14%
YTD
9.13%
1Y
19.26%
3Y*
12.60%
5Y*
6.92%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
5.95%

PFFSX

1D
1.00%
1M
-1.11%
6M
8.76%
YTD
11.64%
1Y
21.85%
3Y*
19.85%
5Y*
14.15%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
17.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

PFTEX vs. PFFSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
PFTEX
PFG Meeder Tactical Strategy Fund
9.13%13.11%13.02%12.53%-13.13%11.68%16.43%
PFFSX
PFG Sector Equity Business Cycle Strategy Fund
11.64%16.17%30.14%18.01%-11.57%26.30%24.12%

Correlation

The correlation between PFTEX and PFFSX is 0.92, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2020

0.92

The correlation between PFTEX and PFFSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PFTEX vs. PFFSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PFTEX
PFTEX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
PFTEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFTEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFTEX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
PFTEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFTEX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

PFFSX
PFFSX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
PFFSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFFSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFFSX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
PFFSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFFSX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PFTEX vs. PFFSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PFG Meeder Tactical Strategy Fund (PFTEX) and PFG Sector Equity Business Cycle Strategy Fund (PFFSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PFTEXPFFSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.25

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.99

1.91

+0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.69

7.66

+1.03

PFTEX vs. PFFSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFTEX Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is comparable to the PFFSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFTEX and PFFSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PFTEX vs. PFFSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFTEX drawdown since its inception was -19.72%, smaller than the maximum PFFSX drawdown of -24.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFTEX and PFFSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PFTEXPFFSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.72%

-24.92%

+5.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.88%

-10.11%

+1.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.53%

-21.45%

+5.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.99%

-24.92%

+6.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.69%

-3.32%

+2.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.32%

-5.88%

+0.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.02%

2.52%

-0.50%

Volatility

PFTEX vs. PFFSX - Volatility Comparison

PFG Meeder Tactical Strategy Fund (PFTEX) has a higher volatility of 3.23% compared to PFG Sector Equity Business Cycle Strategy Fund (PFFSX) at 2.81%. This indicates that PFTEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PFFSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PFTEXPFFSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.23%

2.81%

+0.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.44%

10.74%

-1.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.88%

14.10%

-2.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.11%

18.84%

-2.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.52%

18.70%

-4.18%

PFTEX vs. PFFSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PFTEX has a 2.05% expense ratio, which is higher than PFFSX's 2.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

PFTEX vs. PFFSX - Dividend Comparison

PFTEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.66%, less than PFFSX's 15.40% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
PFFSX
PFG Sector Equity Business Cycle Strategy Fund
15.40%17.19%19.78%2.40%10.90%6.73%5.51%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PFTEX
PFG Meeder Tactical Strategy Fund
8.66%9.45%3.38%2.23%18.46%2.00%1.00%0.15%0.18%0.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, PFTEX and PFFSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PFTEX has higher volatility (3.23%) compared to PFFSX (2.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFTEX dropped -19.72% vs PFFSX's -24.92%.

PFTEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PFTEX and PFFSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer