QSTFX vs. DRRIX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

QSTFX (Quantified STF Fund) and DRRIX (BNY Mellon Global Real Return Fund - Class I) are both Tactical Allocation funds. Over the past 10 years, QSTFX returned 17.63%/yr vs 4.63%/yr for DRRIX. Their 0.45 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. QSTFX charges 1.55%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for DRRIX.

Performance

QSTFX vs. DRRIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Quantified STF Fund (QSTFX) and BNY Mellon Global Real Return Fund - Class I (DRRIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QSTFX achieves a 13.27% return, which is significantly higher than DRRIX's 6.81% return. Over the past 10 years, QSTFX has outperformed DRRIX with an annualized return of 17.63%, while DRRIX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.63% annualized return.

QSTFX

• 1D: 3.29%
• 1M: -6.86%
• 6M: 10.75%
• YTD: 13.27%
• 1Y: 23.74%
• 3Y*: 13.99%
• 5Y*: 7.08%
• 10Y*: 17.63%
• ALL TIME*: 14.83%

DRRIX

• 1D: 1.20%
• 1M: 1.14%
• 6M: 2.07%
• YTD: 6.81%
• 1Y: 15.73%
• 3Y*: 9.99%
• 5Y*: 4.31%
• 10Y*: 4.63%
• ALL TIME*: 4.93%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
DRRIX BNY Mellon Global Real Return Fund - Class I	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
QSTFX Quantified STF Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

QSTFX vs. DRRIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
QSTFX Quantified STF Fund	13.27%	-2.48%	29.94%	61.87%	-46.15%	28.79%	78.20%	16.43%	-6.86%	68.46%
DRRIX BNY Mellon Global Real Return Fund - Class I	6.81%	12.60%	6.88%	2.59%	-8.47%	6.98%	9.75%	12.29%	1.12%	4.29%

Correlation

The correlation between QSTFX and DRRIX is 0.54, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.54
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.59
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.45
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.46
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2015	0.45

The correlation between QSTFX and DRRIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (all time) to 0.59 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

QSTFX vs. DRRIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QSTFX

QSTFX Risk / Return Rank: 24
QSTFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
QSTFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
QSTFX Omega Ratio Rank: 27
QSTFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
QSTFX Martin Ratio Rank: 21

DRRIX

DRRIX Risk / Return Rank: 82
DRRIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
DRRIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
DRRIX Omega Ratio Rank: 78
DRRIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
DRRIX Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QSTFX vs. DRRIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Quantified STF Fund (QSTFX) and BNY Mellon Global Real Return Fund - Class I (DRRIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QSTFX	DRRIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.79	1.90	-1.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.23	2.58	-1.35
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.35	-0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.24	3.14	-1.90
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.01	10.61	-7.61

QSTFX vs. DRRIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QSTFX Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is lower than the DRRIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QSTFX and DRRIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QSTFX vs. DRRIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QSTFX drawdown since its inception was -49.03%, which is greater than DRRIX's maximum drawdown of -15.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QSTFX and DRRIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	QSTFX	DRRIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-49.03%	-15.92%	-33.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.87%	-4.64%	-13.23%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-32.22%	-10.55%	-21.67%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-49.03%	-14.29%	-34.74%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-49.03%	-15.92%	-33.11%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.16%	-0.51%	-10.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.32%	-2.87%	-12.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.33%	1.37%	+5.96%

Volatility

QSTFX vs. DRRIX - Volatility Comparison

Quantified STF Fund (QSTFX) has a higher volatility of 11.74% compared to BNY Mellon Global Real Return Fund - Class I (DRRIX) at 2.10%. This indicates that QSTFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DRRIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QSTFX	DRRIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.74%	2.10%	+9.64%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.25%	6.07%	+15.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.04%	7.68%	+20.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.60%	6.93%	+20.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.22%	6.75%	+21.47%

QSTFX vs. DRRIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QSTFX has a 1.55% expense ratio, which is higher than DRRIX's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

QSTFX vs. DRRIX - Dividend Comparison

QSTFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.40%, more than DRRIX's 3.67% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DRRIX BNY Mellon Global Real Return Fund - Class I	3.67%	3.92%	4.35%	0.05%	9.59%	1.65%	1.39%	2.79%	3.62%	0.88%	2.98%	4.46%
QSTFX Quantified STF Fund	9.40%	10.65%	5.12%	1.03%	0.00%	21.93%	20.82%	0.52%	2.57%	39.11%	0.01%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QSTFX and DRRIX in my portfolio?

QSTFX and DRRIX have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QSTFX or DRRIX?

QSTFX has higher volatility (11.74%) compared to DRRIX (2.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QSTFX dropped -49.03% vs DRRIX's -15.92%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DRRIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.