QSTFX vs. COTZX
Compare and contrast key facts about Quantified STF Fund (QSTFX) and Columbia Thermostat Fund (COTZX).
QSTFX is managed by Advisors Preferred. It was launched on Nov 12, 2015. COTZX is managed by Columbia. It was launched on Sep 24, 2002.
Performance
QSTFX vs. COTZX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
QSTFX vs. COTZX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QSTFX Quantified STF Fund | -11.76% | -2.48% | 29.94% | 61.87% | -46.15% | 28.79% | 78.20% | 16.43% | -6.86% | 68.46% |
COTZX Columbia Thermostat Fund | -1.58% | 15.02% | 7.98% | 11.66% | -12.92% | 6.44% | 29.61% | 15.15% | -1.17% | 3.33% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QSTFX achieves a -11.76% return, which is significantly lower than COTZX's -1.58% return. Over the past 10 years, QSTFX has outperformed COTZX with an annualized return of 13.98%, while COTZX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.08% annualized return.
QSTFX
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- -7.73%
- YTD
- -11.76%
- 6M
- -14.62%
- 1Y
- 15.58%
- 3Y*
- 16.90%
- 5Y*
- 4.88%
- 10Y*
- 13.98%
COTZX
- 1D
- 1.22%
- 1M
- -2.29%
- YTD
- -1.58%
- 6M
- -0.40%
- 1Y
- 12.29%
- 3Y*
- 9.35%
- 5Y*
- 4.20%
- 10Y*
- 7.08%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QSTFX vs. COTZX - Expense Ratio Comparison
QSTFX has a 1.55% expense ratio, which is higher than COTZX's 0.24% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
QSTFX vs. COTZX — Risk / Return Rank
QSTFX
COTZX
QSTFX vs. COTZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Quantified STF Fund (QSTFX) and Columbia Thermostat Fund (COTZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QSTFX | COTZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.65 | 1.49 | -0.83 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.99 | 2.39 | -1.40 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.37 | -0.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.88 | 2.41 | -1.53 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.61 | 12.35 | -9.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QSTFX | COTZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 | 1.49 | -0.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 | 0.58 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | 0.96 | -0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.63 | -0.17 |
Correlation
The correlation between QSTFX and COTZX is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
QSTFX vs. COTZX - Dividend Comparison
QSTFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.07%, more than COTZX's 3.42% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QSTFX Quantified STF Fund | 12.07% | 10.65% | 5.12% | 1.03% | 0.00% | 21.93% | 20.82% | 0.52% | 2.57% | 39.11% | 0.01% | 0.00% |
COTZX Columbia Thermostat Fund | 3.42% | 3.37% | 3.55% | 2.74% | 3.28% | 14.82% | 6.92% | 5.57% | 4.45% | 3.13% | 2.66% | 4.26% |
Drawdowns
QSTFX vs. COTZX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QSTFX drawdown since its inception was -49.03%, roughly equal to the maximum COTZX drawdown of -47.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QSTFX and COTZX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| QSTFX | COTZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.03% | -47.48% | -1.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.87% | -5.40% | -12.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.03% | -17.80% | -31.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.03% | -17.80% | -31.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.73% | -2.62% | -17.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.63% | -3.49% | -12.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.99% | 1.05% | +4.94% |
Volatility
QSTFX vs. COTZX - Volatility Comparison
Quantified STF Fund (QSTFX) has a higher volatility of 6.32% compared to Columbia Thermostat Fund (COTZX) at 2.55%. This indicates that QSTFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COTZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| QSTFX | COTZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.32% | 2.55% | +3.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.30% | 3.61% | +15.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.06% | 8.58% | +15.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.23% | 7.30% | +19.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.70% | 7.36% | +20.34% |