PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QSPRX vs. QDSNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QSPRX vs. QDSNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AQR Style Premia Alternative R6 (QSPRX) and AQR Diversifying Strategies Fund Class N (QDSNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QSPRX achieves a 17.68% return, which is significantly higher than QDSNX's 5.37% return.


QSPRX

1D
0.49%
1M
6.55%
6M
14.53%
YTD
17.68%
1Y
22.36%
3Y*
20.82%
5Y*
20.25%
10Y*
7.87%
ALL TIME*
7.51%

QDSNX

1D
0.68%
1M
2.22%
6M
3.45%
YTD
5.37%
1Y
13.58%
3Y*
11.97%
5Y*
11.01%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

QSPRX vs. QDSNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
QSPRX
AQR Style Premia Alternative R6
17.68%14.94%21.60%12.50%30.90%25.14%-7.67%
QDSNX
AQR Diversifying Strategies Fund Class N
5.37%16.14%9.56%8.62%14.48%10.35%5.40%

Correlation

The correlation between QSPRX and QDSNX is 0.48, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2020

0.71

Over the past year, the correlation between QSPRX and QDSNX has dropped to 0.48 - well below their long-term average of 0.71, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QSPRX vs. QDSNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QSPRX
QSPRX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
QSPRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QSPRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
QSPRX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
QSPRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
QSPRX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

QDSNX
QDSNX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
QDSNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDSNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDSNX Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
QDSNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDSNX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QSPRX vs. QDSNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR Style Premia Alternative R6 (QSPRX) and AQR Diversifying Strategies Fund Class N (QDSNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QSPRXQDSNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.45

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.39

4.13

+0.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.98

13.52

-1.54

QSPRX vs. QDSNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QSPRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is comparable to the QDSNX Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QSPRX and QDSNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QSPRX vs. QDSNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QSPRX drawdown since its inception was -41.22%, which is greater than QDSNX's maximum drawdown of -7.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QSPRX and QDSNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QSPRXQDSNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.22%

-7.15%

-34.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.06%

-3.10%

-1.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.25%

-6.93%

-2.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.17%

-7.15%

-10.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.94%

+0.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.95%

-1.46%

-8.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.85%

0.94%

+0.91%

Volatility

QSPRX vs. QDSNX - Volatility Comparison

AQR Style Premia Alternative R6 (QSPRX) has a higher volatility of 2.23% compared to AQR Diversifying Strategies Fund Class N (QDSNX) at 1.86%. This indicates that QSPRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QDSNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QSPRXQDSNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.23%

1.86%

+0.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.12%

3.96%

+3.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.63%

5.33%

+4.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.89%

7.63%

+8.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.89%

7.29%

+5.60%

QSPRX vs. QDSNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QSPRX has a 5.79% expense ratio, which is higher than QDSNX's 3.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

QSPRX vs. QDSNX - Dividend Comparison

QSPRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.24%, more than QDSNX's 1.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QDSNX
AQR Diversifying Strategies Fund Class N
1.89%1.99%0.00%11.18%8.01%5.99%1.83%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QSPRX
AQR Style Premia Alternative R6
2.24%2.63%6.99%23.75%22.67%12.85%0.00%1.62%1.09%7.15%1.74%5.87%

Frequently Asked Questions


QSPRX and QDSNX have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QSPRX has higher volatility (2.23%) compared to QDSNX (1.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QSPRX dropped -41.22% vs QDSNX's -7.15%.

QDSNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 2.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QSPRX and QDSNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer