PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QSPIX vs. AQMNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QSPIX vs. AQMNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AQR Style Premia Alternative Fund (QSPIX) and AQR Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class N (AQMNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with QSPIX having a 12.83% return and AQMNX slightly lower at 12.66%. Over the past 10 years, QSPIX has outperformed AQMNX with an annualized return of 7.41%, while AQMNX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.72% annualized return.


QSPIX

1D
0.00%
1M
1.14%
YTD
12.83%
6M
14.84%
1Y
17.81%
3Y*
21.40%
5Y*
18.92%
10Y*
7.41%

AQMNX

1D
0.38%
1M
1.14%
YTD
12.66%
6M
14.76%
1Y
24.59%
3Y*
12.17%
5Y*
12.40%
10Y*
4.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QSPIX vs. AQMNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QSPIX
AQR Style Premia Alternative Fund
12.83%14.82%21.48%12.46%30.76%24.93%-21.96%-8.22%-12.35%12.12%
AQMNX
AQR Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class N
12.66%14.38%7.96%1.79%35.16%-1.31%-0.62%1.57%-9.12%-1.19%

Correlation

The correlation between QSPIX and AQMNX is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2014

0.29

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QSPIX vs. AQMNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QSPIX
QSPIX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
QSPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QSPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
QSPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
QSPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
QSPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

AQMNX
AQMNX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
AQMNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AQMNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
AQMNX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
AQMNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
AQMNX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QSPIX vs. AQMNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR Style Premia Alternative Fund (QSPIX) and AQR Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class N (AQMNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QSPIXAQMNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.52

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.57

7.89

-4.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.50

25.06

-15.56

QSPIX vs. AQMNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QSPIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is lower than the AQMNX Sharpe Ratio of 2.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QSPIX and AQMNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QSPIXAQMNXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.89

2.88

-0.99

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.20

1.08

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

0.46

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

0.39

+0.24

Drawdowns

QSPIX vs. AQMNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QSPIX drawdown since its inception was -41.37%, which is greater than AQMNX's maximum drawdown of -27.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QSPIX and AQMNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QSPIXAQMNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.37%

-27.50%

-13.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.09%

-3.15%

-1.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.31%

-13.70%

+4.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.13%

-13.70%

-3.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.37%

-24.13%

-17.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.74%

+0.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.43%

-10.40%

+0.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.91%

0.99%

+0.92%

Volatility

QSPIX vs. AQMNX - Volatility Comparison

AQR Style Premia Alternative Fund (QSPIX) has a higher volatility of 3.15% compared to AQR Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class N (AQMNX) at 2.58%. This indicates that QSPIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AQMNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QSPIXAQMNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.15%

2.58%

+0.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.19%

6.65%

+0.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.61%

8.63%

+0.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.87%

11.55%

+4.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.82%

10.33%

+2.49%

QSPIX vs. AQMNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QSPIX has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is lower than AQMNX's 2.97% expense ratio.


Dividends

QSPIX vs. AQMNX - Dividend Comparison

QSPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.28%, more than AQMNX's 1.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AQMNX
AQR Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class N
1.82%2.05%3.61%8.15%12.59%6.59%4.17%2.92%0.00%0.00%0.02%6.30%
QSPIX
AQR Style Premia Alternative Fund
2.28%2.57%6.95%23.77%22.68%12.78%0.00%1.62%0.96%7.08%1.74%5.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


QSPIX and AQMNX have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QSPIX has higher volatility (3.15%) compared to AQMNX (2.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QSPIX dropped -41.37% vs AQMNX's -27.50%.

AQMNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.88 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QSPIX and AQMNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer