PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QSMLX vs. PRCGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QSMLX vs. PRCGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AQR Small Cap Multi-Style Fund (QSMLX) and Perritt MicroCap Opportunities Fund (PRCGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


QSMLX

1D
0.96%
1M
5.02%
YTD
22.03%
6M
20.37%
1Y
43.86%
3Y*
23.64%
5Y*
11.01%
10Y*
12.39%

PRCGX

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QSMLX vs. PRCGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QSMLX
AQR Small Cap Multi-Style Fund
22.03%17.41%11.02%24.01%-18.31%26.54%17.99%20.42%-14.26%9.33%
PRCGX
Perritt MicroCap Opportunities Fund
13.20%8.36%10.29%12.07%-16.05%31.15%8.88%9.37%-17.61%6.60%

Correlation

The correlation between QSMLX and PRCGX is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2014

0.88

The correlation between QSMLX and PRCGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.88 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QSMLX vs. PRCGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QSMLX
QSMLX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
QSMLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QSMLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
QSMLX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
QSMLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
QSMLX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

PRCGX
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QSMLX vs. PRCGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR Small Cap Multi-Style Fund (QSMLX) and Perritt MicroCap Opportunities Fund (PRCGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QSMLXPRCGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.76

QSMLX vs. PRCGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QSMLXPRCGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

Drawdowns

QSMLX vs. PRCGX - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QSMLXPRCGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.73%

Volatility

QSMLX vs. PRCGX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QSMLXPRCGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.19%

QSMLX vs. PRCGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QSMLX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is lower than PRCGX's 1.56% expense ratio.


Dividends

QSMLX vs. PRCGX - Dividend Comparison

QSMLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.45%, less than PRCGX's 12.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PRCGX
Perritt MicroCap Opportunities Fund
12.01%8.78%8.28%7.34%3.26%15.00%0.00%3.50%14.70%28.27%9.03%1.67%
QSMLX
AQR Small Cap Multi-Style Fund
8.45%10.31%13.88%6.74%0.87%6.13%1.77%0.97%13.57%10.71%2.53%0.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


QSMLX and PRCGX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QSMLX and PRCGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer