PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QSMLX vs. PRCGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QSMLX vs. PRCGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AQR Small Cap Multi-Style Fund (QSMLX) and Perritt MicroCap Opportunities Fund (PRCGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

QSMLX vs. PRCGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QSMLX
AQR Small Cap Multi-Style Fund
-0.44%17.41%11.02%24.01%-18.31%26.54%17.99%20.42%-14.26%9.33%
PRCGX
Perritt MicroCap Opportunities Fund
13.20%8.36%10.29%12.07%-16.05%31.15%8.88%9.37%-17.61%6.60%

Returns By Period


QSMLX

1D
-1.53%
1M
-7.52%
YTD
-0.44%
6M
0.79%
1Y
25.04%
3Y*
16.69%
5Y*
7.23%
10Y*
10.41%

PRCGX

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QSMLX vs. PRCGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QSMLX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is lower than PRCGX's 1.56% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

QSMLX vs. PRCGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QSMLX
QSMLX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
QSMLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QSMLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
QSMLX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
QSMLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
QSMLX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

PRCGX
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QSMLX vs. PRCGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR Small Cap Multi-Style Fund (QSMLX) and Perritt MicroCap Opportunities Fund (PRCGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QSMLXPRCGXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.15

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.69

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.92

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.14

QSMLX vs. PRCGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QSMLXPRCGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

Correlation

The correlation between QSMLX and PRCGX is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

QSMLX vs. PRCGX - Dividend Comparison

QSMLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.36%, less than PRCGX's 12.01% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QSMLX
AQR Small Cap Multi-Style Fund
10.36%10.31%13.88%6.74%0.87%6.13%1.77%0.97%13.57%10.71%2.53%0.22%
PRCGX
Perritt MicroCap Opportunities Fund
12.01%8.78%8.28%7.34%3.26%15.00%0.00%3.50%14.70%28.27%9.03%1.67%

Drawdowns

QSMLX vs. PRCGX - Drawdown Comparison


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


QSMLXPRCGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.27%

Volatility

QSMLX vs. PRCGX - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


QSMLXPRCGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.14%