PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QSMLX vs. AUERX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QSMLX vs. AUERX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AQR Small Cap Multi-Style Fund (QSMLX) and Auer Growth Fund (AUERX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QSMLX achieves a 20.81% return, which is significantly higher than AUERX's 16.34% return. Over the past 10 years, QSMLX has underperformed AUERX with an annualized return of 12.27%, while AUERX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.08% annualized return.


QSMLX

1D
-0.99%
1M
1.90%
YTD
20.81%
6M
18.41%
1Y
42.85%
3Y*
23.23%
5Y*
10.69%
10Y*
12.27%

AUERX

1D
-0.93%
1M
3.65%
YTD
16.34%
6M
15.84%
1Y
48.90%
3Y*
27.71%
5Y*
19.52%
10Y*
16.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QSMLX vs. AUERX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QSMLX
AQR Small Cap Multi-Style Fund
20.81%17.41%11.02%24.01%-18.31%26.54%17.99%20.42%-14.26%9.33%
AUERX
Auer Growth Fund
16.34%30.10%11.12%21.42%9.95%45.11%-1.85%27.96%-25.63%28.75%

Correlation

The correlation between QSMLX and AUERX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2014

0.85

The correlation between QSMLX and AUERX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QSMLX vs. AUERX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QSMLX
QSMLX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
QSMLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QSMLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
QSMLX Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
QSMLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
QSMLX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

AUERX
AUERX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
AUERX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AUERX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
AUERX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
AUERX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
AUERX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QSMLX vs. AUERX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR Small Cap Multi-Style Fund (QSMLX) and Auer Growth Fund (AUERX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QSMLXAUERXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.52

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.57

4.82

-0.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.57

20.72

-5.15

QSMLX vs. AUERX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QSMLX Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is comparable to the AUERX Sharpe Ratio of 3.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QSMLX and AUERX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QSMLXAUERXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.18

3.03

-0.85

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

0.79

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

0.66

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.21

+0.25

Drawdowns

QSMLX vs. AUERX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QSMLX drawdown since its inception was -44.38%, smaller than the maximum AUERX drawdown of -67.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QSMLX and AUERX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QSMLXAUERXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.38%

-67.23%

+22.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.33%

-10.06%

+0.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.69%

-34.80%

+11.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.21%

-34.80%

+4.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.38%

-51.89%

+7.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.99%

-0.93%

-0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.18%

-24.88%

+16.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.73%

2.33%

+0.40%

Volatility

QSMLX vs. AUERX - Volatility Comparison

AQR Small Cap Multi-Style Fund (QSMLX) and Auer Growth Fund (AUERX) have volatilities of 5.38% and 5.25%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QSMLXAUERXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.38%

5.25%

+0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.53%

11.72%

+1.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.55%

16.01%

+3.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.48%

24.84%

-2.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.19%

24.38%

-1.19%

QSMLX vs. AUERX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QSMLX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is lower than AUERX's 2.37% expense ratio.


Dividends

QSMLX vs. AUERX - Dividend Comparison

QSMLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.53%, less than AUERX's 9.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AUERX
Auer Growth Fund
9.79%11.39%24.55%4.54%5.95%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QSMLX
AQR Small Cap Multi-Style Fund
8.53%10.31%13.88%6.74%0.87%6.13%1.77%0.97%13.57%10.71%2.53%0.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


QSMLX and AUERX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QSMLX has higher volatility (5.38%) compared to AUERX (5.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QSMLX dropped -44.38% vs AUERX's -67.23%.

AUERX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.03 vs 2.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QSMLX and AUERX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer