QSML vs. PBW
Compare and contrast key facts about Wisdomtree U.S. Smallcap Quality Growth Fund (QSML) and Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF (PBW).
QSML and PBW are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QSML is a passively managed fund by WisdomTree that tracks the performance of the WisdomTree US SmallCap Quality Growth Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Jan 23, 2024. PBW is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the The WilderHill Clean Energy Index (AMEX). It was launched on Mar 3, 2005. Both QSML and PBW are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
QSML vs. PBW - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
QSML vs. PBW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
QSML Wisdomtree U.S. Smallcap Quality Growth Fund | -3.09% | 5.49% | 10.38% |
PBW Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF | 3.51% | 53.96% | -14.98% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QSML achieves a -3.09% return, which is significantly lower than PBW's 3.51% return.
QSML
- 1D
- 2.75%
- 1M
- -5.17%
- YTD
- -3.09%
- 6M
- -0.81%
- 1Y
- 15.25%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PBW
- 1D
- 4.99%
- 1M
- -2.46%
- YTD
- 3.51%
- 6M
- 9.88%
- 1Y
- 102.59%
- 3Y*
- -6.15%
- 5Y*
- -18.62%
- 10Y*
- 6.57%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QSML vs. PBW - Expense Ratio Comparison
QSML has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than PBW's 0.61% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
QSML vs. PBW — Risk / Return Rank
QSML
PBW
QSML vs. PBW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wisdomtree U.S. Smallcap Quality Growth Fund (QSML) and Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF (PBW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QSML | PBW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.67 | 2.41 | -1.74 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.14 | 2.91 | -1.78 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.35 | -0.20 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.03 | 4.66 | -3.63 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.82 | 12.87 | -9.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QSML | PBW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 | 2.41 | -1.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.44 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.17 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | -0.07 | +0.34 |
Correlation
The correlation between QSML and PBW is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
QSML vs. PBW - Dividend Comparison
QSML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%, less than PBW's 0.86% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QSML Wisdomtree U.S. Smallcap Quality Growth Fund | 0.64% | 0.62% | 0.32% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PBW Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF | 0.86% | 0.79% | 2.84% | 3.68% | 4.21% | 1.71% | 0.44% | 1.45% | 2.04% | 1.28% | 2.68% | 1.53% |
Drawdowns
QSML vs. PBW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QSML drawdown since its inception was -28.54%, smaller than the maximum PBW drawdown of -89.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QSML and PBW.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| QSML | PBW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.54% | -89.02% | +60.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.44% | -21.24% | +6.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -84.98% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -89.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.26% | -73.91% | +65.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.31% | -62.86% | +56.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.89% | 7.70% | -3.81% |
Volatility
QSML vs. PBW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Wisdomtree U.S. Smallcap Quality Growth Fund (QSML) is 6.17%, while Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF (PBW) has a volatility of 12.60%. This indicates that QSML experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PBW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| QSML | PBW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.17% | 12.60% | -6.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.94% | 31.89% | -18.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.86% | 42.85% | -19.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.27% | 42.94% | -21.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.27% | 38.49% | -17.22% |