PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QSML vs. NTSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QSML vs. NTSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Wisdomtree U.S. Smallcap Quality Growth Fund (QSML) and WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

QSML vs. NTSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
QSML
Wisdomtree U.S. Smallcap Quality Growth Fund
-2.60%5.49%10.38%
NTSX
WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund
-4.22%18.82%18.10%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QSML achieves a -2.60% return, which is significantly higher than NTSX's -4.22% return.


QSML

1D
0.50%
1M
-5.04%
YTD
-2.60%
6M
-0.64%
1Y
14.97%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NTSX

1D
0.38%
1M
-5.07%
YTD
-4.22%
6M
-2.82%
1Y
16.25%
3Y*
15.70%
5Y*
8.07%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QSML vs. NTSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QSML has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than NTSX's 0.20% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

QSML vs. NTSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QSML
QSML Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
QSML Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QSML Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
QSML Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
QSML Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
QSML Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

NTSX
NTSX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
NTSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NTSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
NTSX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
NTSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
NTSX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QSML vs. NTSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wisdomtree U.S. Smallcap Quality Growth Fund (QSML) and WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QSMLNTSXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.66

0.89

-0.23

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.12

1.30

-0.18

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.20

-0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.10

1.52

-0.43

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.04

6.52

-2.48

QSML vs. NTSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QSML Sharpe Ratio is 0.66, which is comparable to the NTSX Sharpe Ratio of 0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QSML and NTSX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QSMLNTSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

0.89

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

0.62

-0.34

Correlation

The correlation between QSML and NTSX is 0.70, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

QSML vs. NTSX - Dividend Comparison

QSML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%, less than NTSX's 1.22% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
QSML
Wisdomtree U.S. Smallcap Quality Growth Fund
0.64%0.62%0.32%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NTSX
WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund
1.22%1.14%1.14%1.21%1.36%0.82%0.92%1.42%0.62%

Drawdowns

QSML vs. NTSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QSML drawdown since its inception was -28.54%, smaller than the maximum NTSX drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QSML and NTSX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


QSMLNTSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.54%

-31.34%

+2.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.44%

-11.13%

-3.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.80%

-6.04%

-1.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.31%

-6.92%

+0.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.92%

2.60%

+1.32%

Volatility

QSML vs. NTSX - Volatility Comparison

Wisdomtree U.S. Smallcap Quality Growth Fund (QSML) and WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX) have volatilities of 6.20% and 6.11%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


QSMLNTSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.20%

6.11%

+0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.95%

9.65%

+3.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.86%

18.38%

+4.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.25%

17.04%

+4.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.25%

18.38%

+2.87%