QSIX vs. SRVR
QSIX (Pacer Metarus Nasdaq 100 Dividend Multiplier 600 ETF) and SRVR (Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QSIX is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq-100 Index, while SRVR is a REIT fund tracking the Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, QSIX returned 38.17% vs 11.19% for SRVR. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.60% expense ratio.
Performance
QSIX vs. SRVR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with QSIX having a 19.69% return and SRVR slightly higher at 19.79%.
QSIX
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 10.29%
- YTD
- 19.69%
- 6M
- 18.14%
- 1Y
- 38.17%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SRVR
- 1D
- -1.79%
- 1M
- -2.74%
- YTD
- 19.79%
- 6M
- 20.69%
- 1Y
- 11.19%
- 3Y*
- 8.85%
- 5Y*
- -0.81%
- 10Y*
- —
QSIX vs. SRVR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
QSIX Pacer Metarus Nasdaq 100 Dividend Multiplier 600 ETF | 19.69% | 18.54% | 4.66% |
SRVR Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF | 19.79% | -1.99% | -7.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between QSIX and SRVR is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2024 | 0.41 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QSIX vs. SRVR — Risk / Return Rank
QSIX
SRVR
QSIX vs. SRVR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Metarus Nasdaq 100 Dividend Multiplier 600 ETF (QSIX) and Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF (SRVR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QSIX | SRVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.13 | +0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.47 | 0.76 | +2.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.62 | 1.64 | +11.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QSIX | SRVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.61 | 0.67 | +1.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.04 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.39 | 0.30 | +1.09 |
Drawdowns
QSIX vs. SRVR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QSIX drawdown since its inception was -20.72%, smaller than the maximum SRVR drawdown of -40.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QSIX and SRVR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QSIX | SRVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.72% | -40.99% | +20.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.05% | -14.78% | +3.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.34% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -40.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.28% | -12.28% | +12.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.06% | -15.27% | +12.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.81% | 6.83% | -4.02% |
Volatility
QSIX vs. SRVR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Pacer Metarus Nasdaq 100 Dividend Multiplier 600 ETF (QSIX) is 4.09%, while Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF (SRVR) has a volatility of 5.47%. This indicates that QSIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SRVR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QSIX | SRVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.09% | 5.47% | -1.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.24% | 13.12% | -1.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.72% | 16.72% | -2.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.18% | 19.71% | -0.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.18% | 21.44% | -2.26% |
QSIX vs. SRVR - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both QSIX and SRVR have an expense ratio of 0.60%.
Dividends
QSIX vs. SRVR - Dividend Comparison
QSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.82%, more than SRVR's 2.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QSIX Pacer Metarus Nasdaq 100 Dividend Multiplier 600 ETF | 3.82% | 4.02% | 1.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SRVR Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF | 2.70% | 2.67% | 2.00% | 3.69% | 1.70% | 1.19% | 1.59% | 1.61% | 2.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QSIX and SRVR have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SRVR has higher volatility (5.47%) compared to QSIX (4.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QSIX dropped -20.72% vs SRVR's -40.99%.
On 1-year performance, QSIX leads with 38.17% vs 11.19% for SRVR. Both ETFs have the same 0.60% expense ratio. On volatility, QSIX has been the lower-risk option at 4.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, QSIX has performed better with a 38.17% return vs 11.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QSIX and SRVR have the same expense ratio: 0.60% per year.
QSIX has the higher dividend yield at 3.82%, compared with 2.70% for SRVR.
QSIX is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while SRVR is REIT. QSIX tracks Nasdaq-100 Index, while SRVR tracks Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR Index.
QSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QSIX and SRVR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer