QSIX vs. QCJL

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

QSIX (Pacer Metarus Nasdaq 100 Dividend Multiplier 600 ETF) and QCJL (FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - July) are both Nasdaq-100 funds. QSIX is passively managed, while QCJL is actively managed. Over the past year, QSIX returned 32.02% vs 13.57% for QCJL. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QSIX charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for QCJL.

Performance

QSIX vs. QCJL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Metarus Nasdaq 100 Dividend Multiplier 600 ETF (QSIX) and FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - July (QCJL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QSIX achieves a 15.33% return, which is significantly higher than QCJL's 5.21% return.

QSIX

• 1D: -2.89%
• 1M: -0.31%
• YTD: 15.33%
• 6M: 13.92%
• 1Y: 32.02%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QCJL

• 1D: -0.18%
• 1M: 0.34%
• YTD: 5.21%
• 6M: 5.12%
• 1Y: 13.57%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QSIX vs. QCJL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
QSIX Pacer Metarus Nasdaq 100 Dividend Multiplier 600 ETF	15.33%	18.54%	4.81%
QCJL FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - July	5.21%	13.10%	3.20%

Correlation

The correlation between QSIX and QCJL is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2024	0.90

The correlation between QSIX and QCJL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

QSIX vs. QCJL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QSIX

QSIX Risk / Return Rank: 64
QSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
QSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
QSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 62
QSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
QSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 66

QCJL

QCJL Risk / Return Rank: 84
QCJL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
QCJL Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
QCJL Omega Ratio Rank: 87
QCJL Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
QCJL Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QSIX vs. QCJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Metarus Nasdaq 100 Dividend Multiplier 600 ETF (QSIX) and FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - July (QCJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QSIX	QCJL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.96	2.42	-0.46
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.60	3.52	-0.92
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.49	-0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.91	3.40	-0.49
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.01	17.38	-6.36

QSIX vs. QCJL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QSIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is comparable to the QCJL Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QSIX and QCJL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QSIX vs. QCJL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QSIX drawdown since its inception was -20.72%, which is greater than QCJL's maximum drawdown of -11.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QSIX and QCJL.

Drawdown Indicators

	QSIX	QCJL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.72%	-11.18%	-9.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.05%	-4.00%	-7.05%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.91%	-0.18%	-3.73%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.05%	-1.04%	-2.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.92%	0.78%	+2.14%

Volatility

QSIX vs. QCJL - Volatility Comparison

Pacer Metarus Nasdaq 100 Dividend Multiplier 600 ETF (QSIX) has a higher volatility of 8.16% compared to FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - July (QCJL) at 0.73%. This indicates that QSIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QCJL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QSIX	QCJL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.16%	0.73%	+7.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.28%	4.22%	+9.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.41%	5.67%	+10.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.76%	9.35%	+10.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.76%	9.35%	+10.41%

QSIX vs. QCJL - Expense Ratio Comparison

QSIX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than QCJL's 0.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

QSIX vs. QCJL - Dividend Comparison

QSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.96%, while QCJL has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
QCJL FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - July	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QSIX Pacer Metarus Nasdaq 100 Dividend Multiplier 600 ETF	3.96%	4.02%	1.07%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QSIX and QCJL in my portfolio?

QSIX and QCJL have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QSIX or QCJL?

QSIX has higher volatility (8.16%) compared to QCJL (0.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QSIX dropped -20.72% vs QCJL's -11.18%.

Which ETF is better, QSIX or QCJL?

On 1-year performance, QSIX leads with 32.02% vs 13.57% for QCJL. On fees, QSIX is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, QCJL has been the lower-risk option at 0.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QSIX or QCJL?

Over the 1-year period, QSIX has performed better with a 32.02% return vs 13.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QSIX or QCJL?

QSIX is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for QCJL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QSIX or QCJL?

QSIX has the higher dividend yield at 3.96%, compared with 0.00% for QCJL.

What is the main difference between QSIX and QCJL?

They also come from different issuers: Pacer and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for QSIX and 0.90% for QCJL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QCJL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.