QRVLX vs. FPACX
Compare and contrast key facts about FPA Queens Road Value Fund (QRVLX) and FPA Crescent Fund (FPACX).
QRVLX is managed by FPA. It was launched on Jun 13, 2002. FPACX is managed by FPA. It was launched on Jun 1, 1993.
Performance
QRVLX vs. FPACX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
QRVLX vs. FPACX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QRVLX FPA Queens Road Value Fund | -4.83% | 6.08% | 18.91% | 16.09% | -8.85% | 27.50% | 6.78% | 23.93% | -4.83% | 20.32% |
FPACX FPA Crescent Fund | -3.27% | 17.69% | 12.42% | 20.30% | -9.20% | 15.09% | 12.14% | 20.03% | -7.42% | 10.38% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QRVLX achieves a -4.83% return, which is significantly lower than FPACX's -3.27% return. Over the past 10 years, QRVLX has outperformed FPACX with an annualized return of 10.33%, while FPACX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.35% annualized return.
QRVLX
- 1D
- -0.49%
- 1M
- -6.92%
- YTD
- -4.83%
- 6M
- -7.60%
- 1Y
- 3.31%
- 3Y*
- 11.25%
- 5Y*
- 7.98%
- 10Y*
- 10.33%
FPACX
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- -6.57%
- YTD
- -3.27%
- 6M
- -0.26%
- 1Y
- 14.07%
- 3Y*
- 13.33%
- 5Y*
- 7.95%
- 10Y*
- 9.35%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QRVLX vs. FPACX - Expense Ratio Comparison
QRVLX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than FPACX's 1.00% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
QRVLX vs. FPACX — Risk / Return Rank
QRVLX
FPACX
QRVLX vs. FPACX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FPA Queens Road Value Fund (QRVLX) and FPA Crescent Fund (FPACX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QRVLX | FPACX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.25 | 1.27 | -1.02 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.47 | 1.84 | -1.37 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.27 | -0.21 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.24 | 1.71 | -1.47 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.71 | 6.19 | -5.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QRVLX | FPACX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 | 1.27 | -1.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | 0.67 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 | 0.71 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.86 | -0.33 |
Correlation
The correlation between QRVLX and FPACX is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
QRVLX vs. FPACX - Dividend Comparison
QRVLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.96%, less than FPACX's 9.92% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QRVLX FPA Queens Road Value Fund | 2.96% | 2.81% | 3.64% | 2.95% | 2.77% | 16.71% | 6.49% | 3.40% | 6.82% | 3.99% | 5.48% | 3.12% |
FPACX FPA Crescent Fund | 9.92% | 9.60% | 7.95% | 3.72% | 0.77% | 11.62% | 4.80% | 4.65% | 8.87% | 3.70% | 4.98% | 6.34% |
Drawdowns
QRVLX vs. FPACX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QRVLX drawdown since its inception was -51.40%, which is greater than FPACX's maximum drawdown of -31.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QRVLX and FPACX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| QRVLX | FPACX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.40% | -31.60% | -19.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.68% | -7.37% | -2.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.70% | -18.47% | -3.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.80% | -29.46% | -5.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.35% | -7.19% | -2.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.62% | -3.89% | -2.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.27% | 2.04% | +1.23% |
Volatility
QRVLX vs. FPACX - Volatility Comparison
FPA Queens Road Value Fund (QRVLX) has a higher volatility of 3.61% compared to FPA Crescent Fund (FPACX) at 3.28%. This indicates that QRVLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FPACX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| QRVLX | FPACX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.61% | 3.28% | +0.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.96% | 6.37% | +2.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.39% | 11.09% | +5.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.13% | 11.86% | +3.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.12% | 13.17% | +3.95% |