QRPNX vs. TNMAX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

QRPNX (AQR Alternative Risk Premia Fund Class N) and TNMAX (1290 Multi-Alternative Strategies Fund Class A) are both Multistrategy funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, QRPNX returned 19.43%/yr vs 4.22%/yr for TNMAX. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. QRPNX charges 5.29%/yr vs 1.52%/yr for TNMAX.

Performance

QRPNX vs. TNMAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AQR Alternative Risk Premia Fund Class N (QRPNX) and 1290 Multi-Alternative Strategies Fund Class A (TNMAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QRPNX achieves a 19.65% return, which is significantly higher than TNMAX's 10.25% return.

QRPNX

• 1D: 0.68%
• 1M: 3.75%
• YTD: 19.65%
• 6M: 21.40%
• 1Y: 36.33%
• 3Y*: 23.70%
• 5Y*: 19.43%
• 10Y*: —

TNMAX

• 1D: -0.35%
• 1M: 0.26%
• YTD: 10.25%
• 6M: 10.68%
• 1Y: 20.21%
• 3Y*: 12.29%
• 5Y*: 4.22%
• 10Y*: 3.93%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QRPNX vs. TNMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
QRPNX AQR Alternative Risk Premia Fund Class N	19.65%	23.09%	18.64%	6.94%	24.83%	14.04%	-21.20%	-3.25%	-4.58%
TNMAX 1290 Multi-Alternative Strategies Fund Class A	10.25%	13.21%	8.95%	5.08%	-11.31%	3.00%	4.28%	7.38%	-4.52%

Correlation

The correlation between QRPNX and TNMAX is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.38
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.20
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.04
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2018	-0.01

The correlation between QRPNX and TNMAX shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (5 years) to 0.38 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

QRPNX vs. TNMAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QRPNX

QRPNX Risk / Return Rank: 97
QRPNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
QRPNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
QRPNX Omega Ratio Rank: 93
QRPNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
QRPNX Martin Ratio Rank: 98

TNMAX

TNMAX Risk / Return Rank: 88
TNMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
TNMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
TNMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 85
TNMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
TNMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QRPNX vs. TNMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR Alternative Risk Premia Fund Class N (QRPNX) and 1290 Multi-Alternative Strategies Fund Class A (TNMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QRPNX	TNMAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.92	2.78	+1.14
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	5.72	3.70	+2.02
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.72	1.59	+0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	10.26	5.65	+4.62
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	29.62	21.50	+8.13
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QRPNX vs. TNMAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QRPNX Sharpe Ratio is 3.92, which is higher than the TNMAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QRPNX and TNMAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QRPNX	TNMAX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.92	2.78	+1.14
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.66	0.55	+1.11
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.55	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.83	0.60	+0.23

Drawdowns

QRPNX vs. TNMAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QRPNX drawdown since its inception was -28.78%, which is greater than TNMAX's maximum drawdown of -17.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QRPNX and TNMAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	QRPNX	TNMAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.78%	-17.29%	-11.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.51%	-3.64%	+0.13%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.22%	-7.27%	-3.95%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-11.22%	-16.46%	+5.24%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-17.29%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.86%	+0.86%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.84%	-4.03%	-3.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.22%	0.95%	+0.27%

Volatility

QRPNX vs. TNMAX - Volatility Comparison

AQR Alternative Risk Premia Fund Class N (QRPNX) has a higher volatility of 2.74% compared to 1290 Multi-Alternative Strategies Fund Class A (TNMAX) at 1.59%. This indicates that QRPNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TNMAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QRPNX	TNMAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.74%	1.59%	+1.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.72%	6.18%	+0.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.20%	7.38%	+1.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.76%	7.66%	+4.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.32%	7.12%	+3.20%

QRPNX vs. TNMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QRPNX has a 5.29% expense ratio, which is higher than TNMAX's 1.52% expense ratio.

Dividends

QRPNX vs. TNMAX - Dividend Comparison

QRPNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, less than TNMAX's 1.76% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
QRPNX AQR Alternative Risk Premia Fund Class N	0.95%	1.14%	2.04%	4.33%	0.00%	3.84%	1.98%	0.57%	0.07%	0.00%	0.00%
TNMAX 1290 Multi-Alternative Strategies Fund Class A	1.76%	1.94%	1.33%	3.12%	2.59%	10.42%	0.55%	1.92%	0.97%	0.37%	0.37%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QRPNX and TNMAX in my portfolio?

QRPNX and TNMAX have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QRPNX or TNMAX?

QRPNX has higher volatility (2.74%) compared to TNMAX (1.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QRPNX dropped -28.78% vs TNMAX's -17.29%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QRPNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.92 vs 2.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.