PortfoliosLab logo
QRPIX vs. ACWV
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between QRPIX and ACWV is -0.04. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Performance

QRPIX vs. ACWV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AQR Alternative Risk Premia Fund (QRPIX) and iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

QRPIX:

0.42

ACWV:

1.34

Sortino Ratio

QRPIX:

0.64

ACWV:

1.87

Omega Ratio

QRPIX:

1.11

ACWV:

1.28

Calmar Ratio

QRPIX:

0.55

ACWV:

1.99

Martin Ratio

QRPIX:

1.39

ACWV:

8.31

Ulcer Index

QRPIX:

4.47%

ACWV:

1.81%

Daily Std Dev

QRPIX:

13.26%

ACWV:

10.98%

Max Drawdown

QRPIX:

-31.96%

ACWV:

-28.82%

Current Drawdown

QRPIX:

-5.97%

ACWV:

-0.90%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QRPIX achieves a 6.02% return, which is significantly lower than ACWV's 7.15% return.


QRPIX

YTD

6.02%

1M

5.09%

6M

5.95%

1Y

5.49%

5Y*

12.00%

10Y*

N/A

ACWV

YTD

7.15%

1M

4.40%

6M

3.51%

1Y

14.63%

5Y*

8.54%

10Y*

7.25%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QRPIX vs. ACWV - Expense Ratio Comparison

QRPIX has a 1.40% expense ratio, which is higher than ACWV's 0.20% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

QRPIX vs. ACWV — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QRPIX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of QRPIX is 5353
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of QRPIX is 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of QRPIX is 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of QRPIX is 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of QRPIX is 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of QRPIX is 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

ACWV
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ACWV is 9090
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ACWV is 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ACWV is 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ACWV is 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ACWV is 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ACWV is 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

QRPIX vs. ACWV - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR Alternative Risk Premia Fund (QRPIX) and iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current QRPIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.42, which is lower than the ACWV Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QRPIX and ACWV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

QRPIX vs. ACWV - Dividend Comparison

QRPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.12%, less than ACWV's 2.18% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
QRPIX
AQR Alternative Risk Premia Fund
2.12%2.25%4.50%0.00%4.07%1.97%0.85%0.09%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ACWV
iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF
2.18%2.33%2.41%2.18%1.92%1.77%2.54%2.32%2.04%2.56%2.28%2.23%

Drawdowns

QRPIX vs. ACWV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QRPIX drawdown since its inception was -31.96%, which is greater than ACWV's maximum drawdown of -28.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QRPIX and ACWV. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

QRPIX vs. ACWV - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...