QQXL vs. NRGU
Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares Ultra QQQ Top 30 (QQXL) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU).
QQXL and NRGU are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QQXL is an actively managed fund by ProShares. It was launched on Aug 13, 2025. NRGU is a passively managed fund by BMO that tracks the performance of the Solactive MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index (-300%). It was launched on Apr 9, 2019.
Performance
QQXL vs. NRGU - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
QQXL vs. NRGU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QQXL ProShares Ultra QQQ Top 30 | -12.08% | 8.66% |
NRGU MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN | 139.49% | 0.23% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQXL achieves a -12.08% return, which is significantly lower than NRGU's 139.49% return.
QQXL
- 1D
- 2.82%
- 1M
- -7.39%
- YTD
- -12.08%
- 6M
- -10.46%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NRGU
- 1D
- -10.75%
- 1M
- 24.81%
- YTD
- 139.49%
- 6M
- 107.68%
- 1Y
- 69.15%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QQXL vs. NRGU - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both QQXL and NRGU have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Return for Risk
QQXL vs. NRGU — Risk / Return Rank
QQXL
NRGU
QQXL vs. NRGU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra QQQ Top 30 (QQXL) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QQXL | NRGU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.79 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.19 | 0.61 | -0.81 |
Correlation
The correlation between QQXL and NRGU is -0.10. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
QQXL vs. NRGU - Dividend Comparison
QQXL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, while NRGU has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QQXL ProShares Ultra QQQ Top 30 | 0.73% | 0.08% |
NRGU MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
QQXL vs. NRGU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQXL drawdown since its inception was -27.34%, smaller than the maximum NRGU drawdown of -57.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQXL and NRGU.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQXL | NRGU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.34% | -57.50% | +30.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -55.24% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.73% | -17.40% | -2.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.69% | -25.38% | +17.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 27.12% | — |
Volatility
QQXL vs. NRGU - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| QQXL | NRGU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 23.31% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 50.27% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.70% | 88.18% | -51.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.70% | 87.12% | -50.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.70% | 87.12% | -50.42% |