QQXL vs. MAGS
QQXL (ProShares Ultra QQQ Top 30) and MAGS (Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QQXL is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by ProShares, while MAGS is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QQXL charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for MAGS.
Performance
QQXL vs. MAGS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQXL achieves a 29.93% return, which is significantly higher than MAGS's -7.41% return.
QQXL
- 1D
- 1.80%
- 1M
- -7.57%
- YTD
- 29.93%
- 6M
- 25.57%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MAGS
- 1D
- -2.57%
- 1M
- -12.29%
- YTD
- -7.41%
- 6M
- -9.10%
- 1Y
- 13.70%
- 3Y*
- 28.69%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQXL vs. MAGS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QQXL ProShares Ultra QQQ Top 30 | 29.93% | 9.00% |
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF | -7.41% | 10.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQXL and MAGS is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2025 | 0.87 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQXL vs. MAGS — Risk / Return Rank
QQXL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
MAGS
QQXL vs. MAGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra QQQ Top 30 (QQXL) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QQXL | MAGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.12 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.74 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 2.38 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QQXL vs. MAGS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQXL drawdown since its inception was -27.34%, smaller than the maximum MAGS drawdown of -29.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQXL and MAGS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQXL | MAGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.34% | -29.91% | +2.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -18.62% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -29.91% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.07% | -13.91% | +3.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.81% | -4.77% | -2.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.77% | — |
Volatility
QQXL vs. MAGS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQXL | MAGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.37% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 15.70% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.52% | 20.82% | +19.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.52% | 26.03% | +14.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.52% | 26.03% | +14.49% |
QQXL vs. MAGS - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQXL has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than MAGS's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
QQXL vs. MAGS - Dividend Comparison
QQXL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%, less than MAGS's 1.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF | 1.60% | 1.48% | 0.81% | 0.44% |
QQXL ProShares Ultra QQQ Top 30 | 0.78% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QQXL and MAGS have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MAGS is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MAGS is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for QQXL.
MAGS has the higher dividend yield at 1.60%, compared with 0.78% for QQXL.
QQXL is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while MAGS is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for QQXL and 0.29% for MAGS.
Find the right allocation for QQXL and MAGS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer