QQWZ vs. SRVR

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Pacer Cash COWZ 100-Nasdaq 100 Rotator ETF (QQWZ) and Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF (SRVR).

QQWZ and SRVR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QQWZ is an actively managed fund by Pacer. It was launched on May 6, 2025. SRVR is a passively managed fund by Pacer that tracks the performance of the Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR Index. It was launched on May 15, 2018.

Performance

QQWZ vs. SRVR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Cash COWZ 100-Nasdaq 100 Rotator ETF (QQWZ) and Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF (SRVR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

QQWZ vs. SRVR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
QQWZ Pacer Cash COWZ 100-Nasdaq 100 Rotator ETF	4.75%	26.23%
SRVR Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF	10.71%	-6.64%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQWZ achieves a 4.75% return, which is significantly lower than SRVR's 10.71% return.

QQWZ

• 1D: -0.31%
• 1M: -3.59%
• YTD: 4.75%
• 6M: 5.81%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SRVR

• 1D: 0.83%
• 1M: -5.63%
• YTD: 10.71%
• 6M: 1.23%
• 1Y: 9.91%
• 3Y*: 5.01%
• 5Y*: -0.64%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQWZ vs. SRVR - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQWZ has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than SRVR's 0.60% expense ratio.

SRVR

Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF

QQWZ

Pacer Cash COWZ 100-Nasdaq 100 Rotator ETF

Return for Risk

QQWZ vs. SRVR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SRVR

SRVR Risk / Return Rank: 27
SRVR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
SRVR Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
SRVR Omega Ratio Rank: 26
SRVR Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
SRVR Martin Ratio Rank: 22

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQWZ vs. SRVR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Cash COWZ 100-Nasdaq 100 Rotator ETF (QQWZ) and Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF (SRVR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QQWZ	SRVR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.55	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.03	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.52	0.26	+2.27

Correlation

The correlation between QQWZ and SRVR is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

QQWZ vs. SRVR - Dividend Comparison

QQWZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%, less than SRVR's 2.92% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
QQWZ Pacer Cash COWZ 100-Nasdaq 100 Rotator ETF	0.35%	0.11%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SRVR Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF	2.92%	2.67%	2.00%	3.69%	1.70%	1.19%	1.59%	1.61%	2.13%

Drawdowns

QQWZ vs. SRVR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQWZ drawdown since its inception was -7.81%, smaller than the maximum SRVR drawdown of -40.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQWZ and SRVR.

Drawdown Indicators

	QQWZ	SRVR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-7.81%	-40.99%	+33.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-14.78%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-40.99%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.61%	-18.93%	+15.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.29%	-15.35%	+14.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	6.87%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	QQWZ	SRVR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.82%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	11.96%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.51%	18.24%	-3.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.51%	19.50%	-4.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.51%	21.48%	-6.97%