QQWZ vs. SRVR

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

QQWZ (Pacer Cash COWZ 100-Nasdaq 100 Rotator ETF) and SRVR (Pacer Data & Infrastructure Real Estate ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QQWZ is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Pacer, while SRVR is a REIT fund tracking the FTSE Nareit All Equity REITs Index. QQWZ is actively managed, while SRVR is passively managed. Over the past year, QQWZ returned 25.26% vs -0.06% for SRVR. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.49% expense ratio.

Performance

QQWZ vs. SRVR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Cash COWZ 100-Nasdaq 100 Rotator ETF (QQWZ) and Pacer Data & Infrastructure Real Estate ETF (SRVR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQWZ achieves a 13.90% return, which is significantly higher than SRVR's 9.16% return.

QQWZ

• 1D: -1.79%
• 1M: -1.20%
• 6M: 9.88%
• YTD: 13.90%
• 1Y: 25.26%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SRVR

• 1D: -1.46%
• 1M: -7.99%
• 6M: 4.54%
• YTD: 9.16%
• 1Y: -0.06%
• 3Y*: 3.87%
• 5Y*: -3.29%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQWZ vs. SRVR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
QQWZ Pacer Cash COWZ 100-Nasdaq 100 Rotator ETF	13.90%	26.23%
SRVR Pacer Data & Infrastructure Real Estate ETF	9.16%	-7.76%

Correlation

The correlation between QQWZ and SRVR is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.34
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2025	0.34

Return for Risk

QQWZ vs. SRVR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQWZ

QQWZ Risk / Return Rank: 64
QQWZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
QQWZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
QQWZ Omega Ratio Rank: 58
QQWZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
QQWZ Martin Ratio Rank: 72

SRVR

SRVR Risk / Return Rank: 9
SRVR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
SRVR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
SRVR Omega Ratio Rank: 9
SRVR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
SRVR Martin Ratio Rank: 9

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQWZ vs. SRVR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Cash COWZ 100-Nasdaq 100 Rotator ETF (QQWZ) and Pacer Data & Infrastructure Real Estate ETF (SRVR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QQWZ	SRVR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.56	-0.00	+1.57
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.12	0.12	+2.00
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.01	+0.27
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.25	-0.00	+3.25
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.44	-0.01	+10.45

QQWZ vs. SRVR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQWZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is higher than the SRVR Sharpe Ratio of -0.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQWZ and SRVR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QQWZ vs. SRVR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQWZ drawdown since its inception was -7.81%, smaller than the maximum SRVR drawdown of -40.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQWZ and SRVR.

Drawdown Indicators

	QQWZ	SRVR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-7.81%	-40.99%	+33.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.81%	-14.78%	+6.97%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-18.34%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-40.99%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.45%	-20.07%	+15.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.54%	-15.26%	+13.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.43%	7.40%	-4.97%

Volatility

QQWZ vs. SRVR - Volatility Comparison

Pacer Cash COWZ 100-Nasdaq 100 Rotator ETF (QQWZ) has a higher volatility of 8.02% compared to Pacer Data & Infrastructure Real Estate ETF (SRVR) at 4.48%. This indicates that QQWZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SRVR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QQWZ	SRVR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.02%	4.48%	+3.54%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.17%	14.02%	-1.85%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.27%	17.27%	-1.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.16%	19.84%	-3.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.16%	21.42%	-5.26%

QQWZ vs. SRVR - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both QQWZ and SRVR have an expense ratio of 0.49%.

Dividends

QQWZ vs. SRVR - Dividend Comparison

QQWZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%, less than SRVR's 2.80% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
QQWZ Pacer Cash COWZ 100-Nasdaq 100 Rotator ETF	0.57%	0.11%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SRVR Pacer Data & Infrastructure Real Estate ETF	2.80%	2.67%	2.00%	3.69%	1.70%	1.19%	1.59%	1.61%	2.13%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QQWZ and SRVR in my portfolio?

QQWZ and SRVR have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QQWZ or SRVR?

QQWZ has higher volatility (8.02%) compared to SRVR (4.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQWZ dropped -7.81% vs SRVR's -40.99%.

Which ETF is better, QQWZ or SRVR?

On 1-year performance, QQWZ leads with 25.26% vs -0.06% for SRVR. Both ETFs have the same 0.49% expense ratio. On volatility, SRVR has been the lower-risk option at 4.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QQWZ or SRVR?

Over the 1-year period, QQWZ has performed better with a 25.26% return vs -0.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QQWZ or SRVR?

QQWZ and SRVR have the same expense ratio: 0.49% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QQWZ or SRVR?

SRVR has the higher dividend yield at 2.80%, compared with 0.57% for QQWZ.

What is the main difference between QQWZ and SRVR?

QQWZ is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while SRVR is REIT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QQWZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs -0.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.