QQWZ vs. ESBG

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Pacer Cash COWZ 100-Nasdaq 100 Rotator ETF (QQWZ) and First Trust Enhanced Stocks, Bonds & Gold ETF (ESBG).

QQWZ and ESBG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QQWZ is an actively managed fund by Pacer. It was launched on May 6, 2025. ESBG is an actively managed fund by First Trust. It was launched on Nov 19, 2025.

Performance

QQWZ vs. ESBG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Cash COWZ 100-Nasdaq 100 Rotator ETF (QQWZ) and First Trust Enhanced Stocks, Bonds & Gold ETF (ESBG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

QQWZ vs. ESBG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
QQWZ Pacer Cash COWZ 100-Nasdaq 100 Rotator ETF	4.75%	1.73%
ESBG First Trust Enhanced Stocks, Bonds & Gold ETF	0.41%	5.72%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQWZ achieves a 4.75% return, which is significantly higher than ESBG's 0.41% return.

QQWZ

• 1D: -0.31%
• 1M: -3.59%
• YTD: 4.75%
• 6M: 5.81%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ESBG

• 1D: 4.04%
• 1M: -12.65%
• YTD: 0.41%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQWZ vs. ESBG - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQWZ has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than ESBG's 0.95% expense ratio.

ESBG

First Trust Enhanced Stocks, Bonds & Gold ETF

QQWZ

Pacer Cash COWZ 100-Nasdaq 100 Rotator ETF

Return for Risk

QQWZ vs. ESBG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Cash COWZ 100-Nasdaq 100 Rotator ETF (QQWZ) and First Trust Enhanced Stocks, Bonds & Gold ETF (ESBG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QQWZ	ESBG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.52	0.67	+1.86

Correlation

The correlation between QQWZ and ESBG is 0.40, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

QQWZ vs. ESBG - Dividend Comparison

QQWZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%, less than ESBG's 0.60% yield.

	TTM	2025
QQWZ Pacer Cash COWZ 100-Nasdaq 100 Rotator ETF	0.35%	0.11%
ESBG First Trust Enhanced Stocks, Bonds & Gold ETF	0.60%	0.24%

Drawdowns

QQWZ vs. ESBG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQWZ drawdown since its inception was -7.81%, smaller than the maximum ESBG drawdown of -18.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQWZ and ESBG.

Drawdown Indicators

	QQWZ	ESBG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-7.81%	-18.84%	+11.03%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.61%	-14.85%	+11.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.29%	-4.18%	+2.89%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	QQWZ	ESBG	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.51%	27.73%	-13.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.51%	27.73%	-13.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.51%	27.73%	-13.22%