PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQWZ vs. CALF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQWZ vs. CALF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Cash COWZ 100-Nasdaq 100 Rotator ETF (QQWZ) and Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF (CALF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQWZ achieves a 18.92% return, which is significantly higher than CALF's 13.34% return.


QQWZ

1D
-0.24%
1M
10.66%
YTD
18.92%
6M
16.34%
1Y
37.59%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CALF

1D
-1.12%
1M
4.91%
YTD
13.34%
6M
12.53%
1Y
30.24%
3Y*
10.69%
5Y*
4.12%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQWZ vs. CALF - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between QQWZ and CALF is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2025

0.55

The correlation between QQWZ and CALF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQWZ vs. CALF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQWZ
QQWZ Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
QQWZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQWZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQWZ Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
QQWZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQWZ Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

CALF
CALF Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
CALF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CALF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
CALF Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
CALF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
CALF Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQWZ vs. CALF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Cash COWZ 100-Nasdaq 100 Rotator ETF (QQWZ) and Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF (CALF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QQWZCALFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.34

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.84

4.94

-0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.81

14.08

+3.73

QQWZ vs. CALF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQWZ Sharpe Ratio is 2.75, which is higher than the CALF Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQWZ and CALF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QQWZCALFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.75

1.93

+0.82

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

3.26

0.37

+2.89

Drawdowns

QQWZ vs. CALF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQWZ drawdown since its inception was -7.81%, smaller than the maximum CALF drawdown of -47.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQWZ and CALF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQWZCALFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.81%

-47.58%

+39.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.81%

-6.15%

-1.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.24%

-1.95%

+1.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.36%

-10.74%

+9.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.12%

2.15%

-0.03%

Volatility

QQWZ vs. CALF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacer Cash COWZ 100-Nasdaq 100 Rotator ETF (QQWZ) is 4.35%, while Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF (CALF) has a volatility of 4.92%. This indicates that QQWZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CALF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQWZCALFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.35%

4.92%

-0.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.85%

10.47%

-1.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.77%

15.84%

-2.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.22%

23.44%

-9.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.22%

26.02%

-11.80%

QQWZ vs. CALF - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQWZ has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than CALF's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

QQWZ vs. CALF - Dividend Comparison

QQWZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%, less than CALF's 1.28% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
CALF
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF
1.28%1.43%1.07%1.18%0.85%2.63%0.82%0.99%1.39%0.70%
QQWZ
Pacer Cash COWZ 100-Nasdaq 100 Rotator ETF
0.31%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQWZ and CALF have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CALF has higher volatility (4.92%) compared to QQWZ (4.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQWZ dropped -7.81% vs CALF's -47.58%.

On 1-year performance, QQWZ leads with 37.59% vs 30.24% for CALF. On fees, QQWZ is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, QQWZ has been the lower-risk option at 4.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, QQWZ has performed better with a 37.59% return vs 30.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQWZ is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for CALF.

CALF has the higher dividend yield at 1.28%, compared with 0.31% for QQWZ.

QQWZ is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while CALF is Small Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for QQWZ and 0.59% for CALF.

QQWZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 1.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQWZ and CALF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer