PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQUP vs. FNGG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQUP vs. FNGG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Top QQQ (QQUP) and Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X Shares (FNGG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQUP achieves a 14.50% return, which is significantly lower than FNGG's 28.89% return.


QQUP

1D
-3.99%
1M
7.57%
YTD
14.50%
6M
8.63%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FNGG

1D
-2.33%
1M
23.02%
YTD
28.89%
6M
17.02%
1Y
55.32%
3Y*
62.01%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQUP vs. FNGG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
QQUP
ProShares Ultra Top QQQ
14.50%44.45%
FNGG
Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X Shares
28.89%17.17%

Correlation

The correlation between QQUP and FNGG is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2025

0.90

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQUP vs. FNGG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQUP

FNGG
FNGG Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
FNGG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNGG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNGG Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
FNGG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNGG Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQUP vs. FNGG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Top QQQ (QQUP) and Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X Shares (FNGG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

QQUP vs. FNGG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QQUPFNGGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.77

0.07

+1.70

Drawdowns

QQUP vs. FNGG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQUP drawdown since its inception was -37.67%, smaller than the maximum FNGG drawdown of -91.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQUP and FNGG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQUPFNGGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.67%

-91.33%

+53.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-43.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-47.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.42%

-4.67%

-1.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.20%

-56.04%

+46.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.25%

Volatility

QQUP vs. FNGG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQUPFNGGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.52%

39.61%

-1.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.52%

67.64%

-29.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.52%

67.64%

-29.12%

QQUP vs. FNGG - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQUP has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than FNGG's 0.98% expense ratio.


Dividends

QQUP vs. FNGG - Dividend Comparison

QQUP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%, less than FNGG's 9.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
FNGG
Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X Shares
9.20%11.89%0.79%0.88%0.00%4.99%
QQUP
ProShares Ultra Top QQQ
0.42%0.29%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, QQUP and FNGG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, QQUP is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QQUP is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for FNGG.

FNGG has the higher dividend yield at 9.20%, compared with 0.42% for QQUP.

QQUP tracks Nasdaq-100 Mega Index (200%), while FNGG tracks NYSE FANG+ Index (2x Leveraged). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for QQUP and 0.98% for FNGG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQUP and FNGG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer