QQUP vs. CRMU

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

QQUP (ProShares Ultra QQQ Mega) and CRMU (Leverage Shares 2X Long CRML Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds - QQUP tracks the Nasdaq-100 Mega Index (200%) while CRMU tracks the Critical Metals Corp. (CRML). Both are passively managed. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QQUP charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for CRMU.

Performance

QQUP vs. CRMU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra QQQ Mega (QQUP) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CRML Daily ETF (CRMU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

QQUP

• 1D: -2.93%
• 1M: 1.66%
• 6M: 8.16%
• YTD: 6.08%
• 1Y: 33.68%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CRMU

• 1D: -20.34%
• 1M: -54.63%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQUP vs. CRMU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
QQUP ProShares Ultra QQQ Mega	13.92%
CRMU Leverage Shares 2X Long CRML Daily ETF	-83.97%

Correlation

The correlation between QQUP and CRMU is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 10, 2026	0.58

Return for Risk

QQUP vs. CRMU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQUP

QQUP Risk / Return Rank: 26
QQUP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
QQUP Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
QQUP Omega Ratio Rank: 27
QQUP Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
QQUP Martin Ratio Rank: 24

CRMU

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQUP vs. CRMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra QQQ Mega (QQUP) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CRML Daily ETF (CRMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QQUP	CRMU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.83	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.31	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.90	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.37	—	—

Drawdowns

QQUP vs. CRMU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQUP drawdown since its inception was -37.67%, smaller than the maximum CRMU drawdown of -83.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQUP and CRMU.

Drawdown Indicators

	QQUP	CRMU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.67%	-83.97%	+46.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-37.67%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.30%	-83.97%	+70.67%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.98%	-50.24%	+40.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	14.24%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	QQUP	CRMU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.64%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	32.00%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	40.69%	235.27%	-194.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	39.87%	235.27%	-195.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	39.87%	235.27%	-195.40%

QQUP vs. CRMU - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQUP has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than CRMU's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

QQUP vs. CRMU - Dividend Comparison

QQUP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, while CRMU has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
CRMU Leverage Shares 2X Long CRML Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%
QQUP ProShares Ultra QQQ Mega	0.62%	0.29%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QQUP and CRMU in my portfolio?

QQUP and CRMU have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, QQUP or CRMU?

On fees, CRMU is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, QQUP or CRMU?

CRMU is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for QQUP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QQUP or CRMU?

QQUP has the higher dividend yield at 0.62%, compared with 0.00% for CRMU.

What is the main difference between QQUP and CRMU?

QQUP tracks Nasdaq-100 Mega Index (200%), while CRMU tracks Critical Metals Corp. (CRML). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for QQUP and 0.75% for CRMU.