PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQUP vs. AIBU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQUP vs. AIBU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra QQQ Mega (QQUP) and Direxion Daily AI and Big Data Bull 2X Shares (AIBU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQUP achieves a 6.08% return, which is significantly lower than AIBU's 17.63% return.


QQUP

1D
-2.93%
1M
1.66%
6M
8.16%
YTD
6.08%
1Y
33.68%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AIBU

1D
-5.10%
1M
-10.04%
6M
15.47%
YTD
17.63%
1Y
34.94%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQUP vs. AIBU - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between QQUP and AIBU is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2025

0.82

The correlation between QQUP and AIBU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQUP vs. AIBU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQUP
QQUP Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
QQUP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQUP Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQUP Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
QQUP Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQUP Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

AIBU
AIBU Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
AIBU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIBU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIBU Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
AIBU Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIBU Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQUP vs. AIBU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra QQQ Mega (QQUP) and Direxion Daily AI and Big Data Bull 2X Shares (AIBU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QQUPAIBUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.15

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.90

0.72

+0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.37

1.68

+0.69

QQUP vs. AIBU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQUP Sharpe Ratio is 0.83, which is comparable to the AIBU Sharpe Ratio of 0.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQUP and AIBU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QQUP vs. AIBU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQUP drawdown since its inception was -37.67%, smaller than the maximum AIBU drawdown of -51.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQUP and AIBU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQUPAIBUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.67%

-51.17%

+13.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.67%

-48.71%

+11.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.30%

-24.00%

+10.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.98%

-13.97%

+3.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.24%

20.88%

-6.64%

Volatility

QQUP vs. AIBU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Ultra QQQ Mega (QQUP) is 13.64%, while Direxion Daily AI and Big Data Bull 2X Shares (AIBU) has a volatility of 14.80%. This indicates that QQUP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AIBU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQUPAIBUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.64%

14.80%

-1.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.00%

40.35%

-8.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.69%

51.18%

-10.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.87%

55.79%

-15.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.87%

55.79%

-15.92%

QQUP vs. AIBU - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQUP has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than AIBU's 0.96% expense ratio.


Dividends

QQUP vs. AIBU - Dividend Comparison

QQUP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, less than AIBU's 1.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
AIBU
Direxion Daily AI and Big Data Bull 2X Shares
1.83%2.27%1.33%
QQUP
ProShares Ultra QQQ Mega
0.62%0.29%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQUP and AIBU have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AIBU has higher volatility (14.80%) compared to QQUP (13.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQUP dropped -37.67% vs AIBU's -51.17%.

On 1-year performance, AIBU leads with 34.94% vs 33.68% for QQUP. On fees, QQUP is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, QQUP has been the lower-risk option at 13.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AIBU has performed better with a 34.94% return vs 33.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQUP is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for AIBU.

AIBU has the higher dividend yield at 1.83%, compared with 0.62% for QQUP.

QQUP tracks Nasdaq-100 Mega Index (200%), while AIBU tracks Solactive US AI & Big Data Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for QQUP and 0.96% for AIBU.

QQUP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.83 vs 0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQUP and AIBU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer