QQQY vs. XMAG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

QQQY (Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF) and XMAG (Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QQQY is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Defiance, while XMAG is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the BITA US 500 ex Magnificent 7 Index. QQQY is actively managed, while XMAG is passively managed. Over the past year, QQQY returned 36.38% vs 24.62% for XMAG. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QQQY charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XMAG.

Performance

QQQY vs. XMAG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF (QQQY) and Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF (XMAG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQY achieves a 19.07% return, which is significantly higher than XMAG's 12.73% return.

QQQY

• 1D: -0.36%
• 1M: 9.64%
• YTD: 19.07%
• 6M: 19.11%
• 1Y: 36.38%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XMAG

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: 6.69%
• YTD: 12.73%
• 6M: 13.28%
• 1Y: 24.62%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQY vs. XMAG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
QQQY Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF	19.07%	14.96%	-2.41%
XMAG Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF	12.73%	15.63%	-1.67%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQY and XMAG is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.71
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2024	0.72

The correlation between QQQY and XMAG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

QQQY vs. XMAG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQY

QQQY Risk / Return Rank: 74
QQQY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
QQQY Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
QQQY Omega Ratio Rank: 80
QQQY Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
QQQY Martin Ratio Rank: 73

XMAG

XMAG Risk / Return Rank: 68
XMAG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
XMAG Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
XMAG Omega Ratio Rank: 63
XMAG Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
XMAG Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQY vs. XMAG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF (QQQY) and Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF (XMAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QQQY	XMAG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.68	2.23	+0.45
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.37	3.21	+0.16
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.49	1.39	+0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.28	3.39	-0.11
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.95	15.15	-1.20
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QQQY vs. XMAG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQY Sharpe Ratio is 2.68, which is comparable to the XMAG Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQY and XMAG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QQQY	XMAG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.68	2.23	+0.45
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.25	1.11	+0.14

Drawdowns

QQQY vs. XMAG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQY drawdown since its inception was -19.05%, which is greater than XMAG's maximum drawdown of -16.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQY and XMAG.

Drawdown Indicators

	QQQY	XMAG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.05%	-16.17%	-2.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.14%	-7.29%	-3.85%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.36%	0.00%	-0.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.91%	-2.13%	-0.78%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.61%	1.63%	+0.98%

Volatility

QQQY vs. XMAG - Volatility Comparison

Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF (QQQY) has a higher volatility of 4.21% compared to Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF (XMAG) at 2.87%. This indicates that QQQY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XMAG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QQQY	XMAG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.21%	2.87%	+1.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.30%	8.65%	+2.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.67%	11.10%	+2.57%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.75%	15.12%	-0.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.75%	15.12%	-0.37%

QQQY vs. XMAG - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than XMAG's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

QQQY vs. XMAG - Dividend Comparison

QQQY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 34.34%, more than XMAG's 0.46% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
QQQY Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF	34.34%	45.34%	83.34%	20.64%
XMAG Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF	0.46%	0.51%	0.24%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QQQY and XMAG in my portfolio?

QQQY and XMAG have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QQQY or XMAG?

QQQY has higher volatility (4.21%) compared to XMAG (2.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQY dropped -19.05% vs XMAG's -16.17%.

Which ETF is better, QQQY or XMAG?

On 1-year performance, QQQY leads with 36.38% vs 24.62% for XMAG. On fees, XMAG is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XMAG has been the lower-risk option at 2.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QQQY or XMAG?

Over the 1-year period, QQQY has performed better with a 36.38% return vs 24.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QQQY or XMAG?

XMAG is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for QQQY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QQQY or XMAG?

QQQY has the higher dividend yield at 34.34%, compared with 0.46% for XMAG.

What is the main difference between QQQY and XMAG?

QQQY is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while XMAG is Large Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for QQQY and 0.35% for XMAG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QQQY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs 2.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.