QQQY vs. NAPR
QQQY (Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF) and NAPR (Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April) are both Nasdaq-100 funds. QQQY is actively managed, while NAPR is passively managed. Over the past year, QQQY returned 36.38% vs 18.45% for NAPR. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QQQY charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for NAPR.
Performance
QQQY vs. NAPR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQQY achieves a 19.07% return, which is significantly higher than NAPR's 10.51% return.
QQQY
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- 9.64%
- YTD
- 19.07%
- 6M
- 19.11%
- 1Y
- 36.38%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NAPR
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 2.09%
- YTD
- 10.51%
- 6M
- 11.15%
- 1Y
- 18.45%
- 3Y*
- 13.26%
- 5Y*
- 10.10%
- 10Y*
- —
QQQY vs. NAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQY Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF | 19.07% | 14.96% | 7.70% | 7.22% |
NAPR Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April | 10.51% | 6.56% | 13.29% | 4.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQQY and NAPR is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2023 | 0.84 |
The correlation between QQQY and NAPR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQQY vs. NAPR — Risk / Return Rank
QQQY
NAPR
QQQY vs. NAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF (QQQY) and Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April (NAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QQQY | NAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 2.18 | -0.70 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.28 | 14.95 | -11.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.95 | 84.84 | -70.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QQQY | NAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.68 | 4.78 | -2.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.90 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.25 | 1.07 | +0.18 |
Drawdowns
QQQY vs. NAPR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQQY drawdown since its inception was -19.05%, which is greater than NAPR's maximum drawdown of -16.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQY and NAPR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQQY | NAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.05% | -16.53% | -2.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.14% | -1.24% | -9.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.52% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.53% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.36% | -0.12% | -0.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.91% | -2.28% | -0.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.61% | 0.22% | +2.39% |
Volatility
QQQY vs. NAPR - Volatility Comparison
Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF (QQQY) has a higher volatility of 4.21% compared to Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April (NAPR) at 1.10%. This indicates that QQQY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NAPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQQY | NAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.21% | 1.10% | +3.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.30% | 2.82% | +8.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.67% | 3.89% | +9.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.75% | 11.27% | +3.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.75% | 10.61% | +4.14% |
QQQY vs. NAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQQY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than NAPR's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
QQQY vs. NAPR - Dividend Comparison
QQQY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 34.34%, while NAPR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
NAPR Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQQY Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF | 34.34% | 45.34% | 83.34% | 20.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QQQY and NAPR have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QQQY has higher volatility (4.21%) compared to NAPR (1.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQY dropped -19.05% vs NAPR's -16.53%.
On 1-year performance, QQQY leads with 36.38% vs 18.45% for NAPR. On fees, NAPR is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, NAPR has been the lower-risk option at 1.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, QQQY has performed better with a 36.38% return vs 18.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NAPR is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for QQQY.
QQQY has the higher dividend yield at 34.34%, compared with 0.00% for NAPR.
They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for QQQY and 0.79% for NAPR.
NAPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.78 vs 2.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QQQY and NAPR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer