PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQY vs. MSTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQQY vs. MSTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF (QQQY) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Long MSTR ETF (MSTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQY achieves a 19.07% return, which is significantly higher than MSTX's -54.94% return.


QQQY

1D
-0.36%
1M
9.64%
YTD
19.07%
6M
19.11%
1Y
36.38%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MSTX

1D
-14.41%
1M
-56.02%
YTD
-54.94%
6M
-72.02%
1Y
-95.49%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQY vs. MSTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
QQQY
Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF
19.07%14.96%0.56%
MSTX
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long MSTR ETF
-54.94%-89.06%137.37%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQY and MSTX is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 16, 2024

0.47

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQQY vs. MSTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQY
QQQY Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
QQQY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQY Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQY Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

MSTX
MSTX Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
MSTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSTX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
MSTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSTX Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQY vs. MSTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF (QQQY) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Long MSTR ETF (MSTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QQQYMSTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+5.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

0.78

+0.71

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.28

-0.99

+4.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.95

-1.27

+15.22

QQQY vs. MSTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQY Sharpe Ratio is 2.68, which is higher than the MSTX Sharpe Ratio of -0.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQY and MSTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QQQYMSTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.68

-0.68

+3.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.25

-0.42

+1.67

Drawdowns

QQQY vs. MSTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQY drawdown since its inception was -19.05%, smaller than the maximum MSTX drawdown of -98.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQY and MSTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQYMSTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.05%

-98.66%

+79.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.14%

-96.62%

+85.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.36%

-98.61%

+98.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.91%

-69.94%

+67.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.61%

75.26%

-72.65%

Volatility

QQQY vs. MSTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF (QQQY) is 4.21%, while Defiance Daily Target 2X Long MSTR ETF (MSTX) has a volatility of 39.64%. This indicates that QQQY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQQYMSTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.21%

39.64%

-35.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.30%

112.57%

-101.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.67%

140.09%

-126.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.75%

167.46%

-152.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.75%

167.46%

-152.71%

QQQY vs. MSTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than MSTX's 1.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

QQQY vs. MSTX - Dividend Comparison

QQQY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 34.34%, while MSTX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
MSTX
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long MSTR ETF
0.00%0.00%41.01%0.00%
QQQY
Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF
34.34%45.34%83.34%20.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQQY and MSTX have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MSTX has higher volatility (39.64%) compared to QQQY (4.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQY dropped -19.05% vs MSTX's -98.66%.

On 1-year performance, QQQY leads with 36.38% vs -95.49% for MSTX. On fees, QQQY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, QQQY has been the lower-risk option at 4.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, QQQY has performed better with a 36.38% return vs -95.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for MSTX.

QQQY has the higher dividend yield at 34.34%, compared with 0.00% for MSTX.

QQQY is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while MSTX is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for QQQY and 1.29% for MSTX.

QQQY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs -0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQQY and MSTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer