PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQY vs. IWMY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQQY vs. IWMY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF (QQQY) and Defiance R2000 Weekly Distribution ETF (IWMY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with QQQY having a 17.47% return and IWMY slightly lower at 17.15%.


QQQY

1D
3.25%
1M
1.46%
6M
17.52%
YTD
17.47%
1Y
25.95%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
16.61%

IWMY

1D
1.63%
1M
1.32%
6M
11.80%
YTD
17.15%
1Y
22.23%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
15.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$635.64K$720.90K$1.00M
$2.03M$2.15M$2.90M

QQQY vs. IWMY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
QQQY
Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF
17.47%14.96%7.70%11.49%
IWMY
Defiance R2000 Weekly Distribution ETF
17.15%10.18%5.56%10.06%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQY and IWMY is 0.72, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2023

0.66

The correlation between QQQY and IWMY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQQY vs. IWMY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QQQY
QQQY Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
QQQY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQY Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQY Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQY Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

IWMY
IWMY Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
IWMY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWMY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWMY Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
IWMY Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWMY Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QQQY vs. IWMY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF (QQQY) and Defiance R2000 Weekly Distribution ETF (IWMY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QQQYIWMYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.24

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.34

1.93

+0.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.22

6.27

+1.95

QQQY vs. IWMY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQY Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is comparable to the IWMY Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQY and IWMY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QQQY vs. IWMY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQY drawdown since its inception was -19.05%, roughly equal to the maximum IWMY drawdown of -18.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQY and IWMY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQYIWMYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.05%

-18.72%

-0.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.14%

-11.57%

+0.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.71%

0.00%

-1.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.96%

-2.88%

-0.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.17%

3.56%

-0.39%

Volatility

QQQY vs. IWMY - Volatility Comparison

Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF (QQQY) has a higher volatility of 7.24% compared to Defiance R2000 Weekly Distribution ETF (IWMY) at 4.15%. This indicates that QQQY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWMY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQQYIWMYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.24%

4.15%

+3.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.55%

13.57%

+1.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.65%

16.38%

+1.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.86%

15.82%

+0.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.86%

15.82%

+0.04%

QQQY vs. IWMY - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than IWMY's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

QQQY vs. IWMY - Dividend Comparison

QQQY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 35.76%, less than IWMY's 40.50% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
IWMY
Defiance R2000 Weekly Distribution ETF
40.50%63.33%107.92%11.34%
QQQY
Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF
35.76%45.34%83.34%20.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQQY and IWMY have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQY has higher volatility (7.24%) compared to IWMY (4.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQY dropped -19.05% vs IWMY's -18.72%.

On 1-year performance, QQQY leads with 25.95% vs 22.23% for IWMY. On fees, QQQY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, IWMY has been the lower-risk option at 4.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, QQQY has performed better with a 25.95% return vs 22.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for IWMY.

IWMY has the higher dividend yield at 40.50%, compared with 35.76% for QQQY.

QQQY is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while IWMY is Options Trading. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for QQQY and 1.05% for IWMY.

QQQY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQQY and IWMY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer