PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQY vs. BALQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQQY vs. BALQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF (QQQY) and iShares Nasdaq Premium Income Active ETF (BALQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQY achieves a 19.07% return, which is significantly lower than BALQ's 22.89% return.


QQQY

1D
-0.36%
1M
9.64%
YTD
19.07%
6M
19.11%
1Y
36.38%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BALQ

1D
-0.21%
1M
11.15%
YTD
22.89%
6M
22.29%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQY vs. BALQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between QQQY and BALQ is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2025

0.97

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQQY vs. BALQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQY
QQQY Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
QQQY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQY Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQY Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

BALQ
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQY vs. BALQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF (QQQY) and iShares Nasdaq Premium Income Active ETF (BALQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QQQYBALQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.95

QQQY vs. BALQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QQQYBALQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.25

2.81

-1.56

Drawdowns

QQQY vs. BALQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQY drawdown since its inception was -19.05%, which is greater than BALQ's maximum drawdown of -11.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQY and BALQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQYBALQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.05%

-11.79%

-7.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.36%

-0.21%

-0.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.91%

-2.37%

-0.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.61%

Volatility

QQQY vs. BALQ - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQQYBALQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.67%

18.03%

-4.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.75%

18.03%

-3.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.75%

18.03%

-3.28%

QQQY vs. BALQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than BALQ's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

QQQY vs. BALQ - Dividend Comparison

QQQY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 34.34%, more than BALQ's 4.59% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
BALQ
iShares Nasdaq Premium Income Active ETF
4.59%0.95%0.00%0.00%
QQQY
Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF
34.34%45.34%83.34%20.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, QQQY and BALQ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, BALQ is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BALQ is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for QQQY.

QQQY has the higher dividend yield at 34.34%, compared with 4.59% for BALQ.

They also come from different issuers: Defiance and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for QQQY and 0.35% for BALQ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQQY and BALQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer