QQQY.TO vs. LBIT.TO
QQQY.TO (Evolve NASDAQ Technology Enhanced Yield Index Fund) and LBIT.TO (Evolve Levered Bitcoin ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QQQY.TO is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Adjusted Market-Cap Weighted™ Index, while LBIT.TO is a Leveraged Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Evolve. QQQY.TO is passively managed, while LBIT.TO is actively managed. Over the past year, QQQY.TO returned 52.29% vs -46.69% for LBIT.TO. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QQQY.TO charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for LBIT.TO.
Performance
QQQY.TO vs. LBIT.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQQY.TO achieves a 20.66% return, which is significantly higher than LBIT.TO's -30.02% return.
QQQY.TO
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- 12.57%
- YTD
- 20.66%
- 6M
- 19.40%
- 1Y
- 52.29%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LBIT.TO
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- -19.20%
- YTD
- -30.02%
- 6M
- -35.83%
- 1Y
- -46.69%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQQY.TO vs. LBIT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QQQY.TO Evolve NASDAQ Technology Enhanced Yield Index Fund | 20.66% | 36.66% |
LBIT.TO Evolve Levered Bitcoin ETF | -30.02% | -1.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQQY.TO and LBIT.TO is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2025 | 0.38 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQQY.TO vs. LBIT.TO — Risk / Return Rank
QQQY.TO
LBIT.TO
QQQY.TO vs. LBIT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Evolve NASDAQ Technology Enhanced Yield Index Fund (QQQY.TO) and Evolve Levered Bitcoin ETF (LBIT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QQQY.TO | LBIT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 0.85 | +0.63 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.52 | -0.80 | +4.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.82 | -1.34 | +15.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QQQY.TO | LBIT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.81 | -0.89 | +3.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.07 | -0.51 | +0.58 |
Drawdowns
QQQY.TO vs. LBIT.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQQY.TO drawdown since its inception was -26.27%, smaller than the maximum LBIT.TO drawdown of -58.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQY.TO and LBIT.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQQY.TO | LBIT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.27% | -58.70% | +32.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.91% | -58.70% | +43.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.14% | -56.66% | +56.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.03% | -24.25% | +20.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.79% | 34.90% | -31.11% |
Volatility
QQQY.TO vs. LBIT.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Evolve NASDAQ Technology Enhanced Yield Index Fund (QQQY.TO) is 4.62%, while Evolve Levered Bitcoin ETF (LBIT.TO) has a volatility of 11.88%. This indicates that QQQY.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LBIT.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQQY.TO | LBIT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.62% | 11.88% | -7.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.65% | 42.12% | -27.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.74% | 52.56% | -33.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15,024.21% | 51.49% | +14,972.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15,024.21% | 51.49% | +14,972.72% |
QQQY.TO vs. LBIT.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQQY.TO has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than LBIT.TO's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
QQQY.TO vs. LBIT.TO - Dividend Comparison
QQQY.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.29%, while LBIT.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
LBIT.TO Evolve Levered Bitcoin ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQQY.TO Evolve NASDAQ Technology Enhanced Yield Index Fund | 12.29% | 13.97% | 14.09% | 2.73% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QQQY.TO and LBIT.TO have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QQQY.TO is cheaper at 0.74% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QQQY.TO is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for LBIT.TO.
QQQY.TO is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while LBIT.TO is Leveraged Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for QQQY.TO and 0.75% for LBIT.TO.
Find the right allocation for QQQY.TO and LBIT.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer