PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQY.TO vs. LBIT.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQQY.TO vs. LBIT.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Evolve NASDAQ Technology Enhanced Yield Index Fund (QQQY.TO) and Evolve Levered Bitcoin ETF (LBIT.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQY.TO achieves a 20.66% return, which is significantly higher than LBIT.TO's -30.02% return.


QQQY.TO

1D
-0.14%
1M
12.57%
YTD
20.66%
6M
19.40%
1Y
52.29%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

LBIT.TO

1D
-0.45%
1M
-19.20%
YTD
-30.02%
6M
-35.83%
1Y
-46.69%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQY.TO vs. LBIT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
QQQY.TO
Evolve NASDAQ Technology Enhanced Yield Index Fund
20.66%36.66%
LBIT.TO
Evolve Levered Bitcoin ETF
-30.02%-1.29%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQY.TO and LBIT.TO is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2025

0.38

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQQY.TO vs. LBIT.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQY.TO
QQQY.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
QQQY.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQY.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQY.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQY.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQY.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

LBIT.TO
LBIT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
LBIT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LBIT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
LBIT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
LBIT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
LBIT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQY.TO vs. LBIT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Evolve NASDAQ Technology Enhanced Yield Index Fund (QQQY.TO) and Evolve Levered Bitcoin ETF (LBIT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QQQY.TOLBIT.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

0.85

+0.63

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.52

-0.80

+4.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.82

-1.34

+15.16

QQQY.TO vs. LBIT.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQY.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.81, which is higher than the LBIT.TO Sharpe Ratio of -0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQY.TO and LBIT.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QQQY.TOLBIT.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.81

-0.89

+3.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.07

-0.51

+0.58

Drawdowns

QQQY.TO vs. LBIT.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQY.TO drawdown since its inception was -26.27%, smaller than the maximum LBIT.TO drawdown of -58.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQY.TO and LBIT.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQY.TOLBIT.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.27%

-58.70%

+32.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.91%

-58.70%

+43.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.14%

-56.66%

+56.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.03%

-24.25%

+20.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.79%

34.90%

-31.11%

Volatility

QQQY.TO vs. LBIT.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Evolve NASDAQ Technology Enhanced Yield Index Fund (QQQY.TO) is 4.62%, while Evolve Levered Bitcoin ETF (LBIT.TO) has a volatility of 11.88%. This indicates that QQQY.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LBIT.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQQY.TOLBIT.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.62%

11.88%

-7.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.65%

42.12%

-27.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.74%

52.56%

-33.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15,024.21%

51.49%

+14,972.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15,024.21%

51.49%

+14,972.72%

QQQY.TO vs. LBIT.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQY.TO has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than LBIT.TO's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

QQQY.TO vs. LBIT.TO - Dividend Comparison

QQQY.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.29%, while LBIT.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
LBIT.TO
Evolve Levered Bitcoin ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QQQY.TO
Evolve NASDAQ Technology Enhanced Yield Index Fund
12.29%13.97%14.09%2.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQQY.TO and LBIT.TO have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QQQY.TO is cheaper at 0.74% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QQQY.TO is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for LBIT.TO.

QQQY.TO is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while LBIT.TO is Leveraged Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for QQQY.TO and 0.75% for LBIT.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQQY.TO and LBIT.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer