QQQY.L vs. XNAS.L
QQQY.L (IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP) and XNAS.L (Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF) are both Nasdaq-100 funds. QQQY.L is actively managed, while XNAS.L is passively managed. Over the past year, QQQY.L returned 31.81% vs 40.41% for XNAS.L. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QQQY.L charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for XNAS.L.
Performance
QQQY.L vs. XNAS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQQY.L achieves a 15.10% return, which is significantly lower than XNAS.L's 19.67% return.
QQQY.L
- 1D
- -0.82%
- 1M
- 7.64%
- YTD
- 15.10%
- 6M
- 14.75%
- 1Y
- 31.81%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XNAS.L
- 1D
- -0.68%
- 1M
- 8.53%
- YTD
- 19.67%
- 6M
- 19.16%
- 1Y
- 40.41%
- 3Y*
- 28.10%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQQY.L vs. XNAS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
QQQY.L IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP | 15.10% | 14.25% | 7.28% |
XNAS.L Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF | 19.67% | 19.83% | 10.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQQY.L and XNAS.L is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2024 | 0.67 |
The correlation between QQQY.L and XNAS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQQY.L vs. XNAS.L — Risk / Return Rank
QQQY.L
XNAS.L
QQQY.L vs. XNAS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP (QQQY.L) and Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XNAS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QQQY.L | XNAS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.44 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.32 | 3.67 | +0.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.40 | 13.19 | +0.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QQQY.L | XNAS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.18 | 2.54 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.02 | 1.69 | -0.66 |
Drawdowns
QQQY.L vs. XNAS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQQY.L drawdown since its inception was -19.23%, smaller than the maximum XNAS.L drawdown of -22.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQY.L and XNAS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQQY.L | XNAS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.23% | -22.92% | +3.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.34% | -10.91% | +3.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.92% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.93% | -0.76% | -0.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.18% | -3.03% | -0.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.37% | 3.05% | -0.68% |
Volatility
QQQY.L vs. XNAS.L - Volatility Comparison
IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP (QQQY.L) and Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XNAS.L) have volatilities of 4.78% and 4.96%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQQY.L | XNAS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.78% | 4.96% | -0.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.22% | 11.72% | -1.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.52% | 15.78% | -1.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.98% | 19.39% | +1.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.98% | 19.39% | +1.59% |
QQQY.L vs. XNAS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQQY.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than XNAS.L's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
QQQY.L vs. XNAS.L - Dividend Comparison
QQQY.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 67.73%, while XNAS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
QQQY.L IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP | 67.73% | 120.60% | 18.65% |
XNAS.L Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QQQY.L and XNAS.L have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XNAS.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XNAS.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for QQQY.L.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for QQQY.L and 0.20% for XNAS.L.
Find the right allocation for QQQY.L and XNAS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer