PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
QQQY.L vs. NASD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

QQQY.L vs. NASD.L

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

QQQY.L (IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP) and NASD.L (Lyxor Nasdaq-100 Ucits ETF Acc USD) are both Nasdaq-100 funds. QQQY.L is actively managed, while NASD.L is passively managed. Over the past year, QQQY.L returned 23.58% vs 32.42% for NASD.L. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QQQY.L charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for NASD.L.

Performance

QQQY.L vs. NASD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP (QQQY.L) and Lyxor Nasdaq-100 Ucits ETF Acc USD (NASD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQY.L achieves a 10.62% return, which is significantly lower than NASD.L's 15.54% return.

QQQY.L

1D
-0.57%
1M
-3.16%
YTD
10.62%
6M
10.11%
1Y
23.58%
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—

NASD.L

1D
-0.60%
1M
-2.00%
YTD
15.54%
6M
14.82%
1Y
32.42%
3Y*
26.13%
5Y*
15.96%
10Y*
23.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQY.L vs. NASD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024
QQQY.L
IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP		10.62%14.17%-2.12%
NASD.L
Lyxor Nasdaq-100 Ucits ETF Acc USD		15.54%19.86%9.13%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQY.L and NASD.L is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 28, 2024

0.67

The correlation between QQQY.L and NASD.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP

Lyxor Nasdaq-100 Ucits ETF Acc USD

Often compared with QQQY.L:
QQQY.L vs. QQQQQQY.L vs. QQQIQQQY.L vs. MSTYQQQY.L vs. COIY.DEQQQY.L vs. VOOQQQY.L vs. SPYY.LQQQY.L vs. MAGD.L
Often compared with NASD.L:
NASD.L vs. AAPLNASD.L vs. TSLANASD.L vs. AIAI.LNASD.L vs. SUSW.LNASD.L vs. METANASD.L vs. NVDANASD.L vs. DGIT.L

Return for Risk

QQQY.L vs. NASD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
QQQY.L
QQQY.L Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
QQQY.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQY.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQY.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQY.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQY.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
NASD.L
NASD.L Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
NASD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NASD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
NASD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
NASD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
NASD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQY.L vs. NASD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP (QQQY.L) and Lyxor Nasdaq-100 Ucits ETF Acc USD (NASD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

QQQY.LNASD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.67
1.92

-0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.26
2.70

-0.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.34

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.22

2.95

+0.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.76

10.25

+0.51

QQQY.L vs. NASD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQY.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is comparable to the NASD.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQY.L and NASD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QQQY.L vs. NASD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQY.L drawdown since its inception was -19.38%, smaller than the maximum NASD.L drawdown of -41.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQY.L and NASD.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

QQQY.LNASD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.38%

-41.96%

+22.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.29%

-10.93%

+3.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

—

-22.36%

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

—

-35.01%

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-35.01%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.92%

-4.21%

-0.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.84%

-7.41%

+3.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.19%

3.16%

-0.97%

Volatility

QQQY.L vs. NASD.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP (QQQY.L) is 5.82%, while Lyxor Nasdaq-100 Ucits ETF Acc USD (NASD.L) has a volatility of 6.76%. This indicates that QQQY.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NASD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

QQQY.LNASD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.82%

6.76%

-0.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.54%

13.18%

-1.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.04%

16.79%

-2.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.90%

21.64%

+0.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.90%

21.62%

+0.28%

QQQY.L vs. NASD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQY.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than NASD.L's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

QQQY.L vs. NASD.L - Dividend Comparison

QQQY.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 70.49%, while NASD.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
NASD.L
Lyxor Nasdaq-100 Ucits ETF Acc USD		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.66%0.69%0.87%
QQQY.L
IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP		70.49%120.63%8.51%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

QQQY.L and NASD.L have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, NASD.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

NASD.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for QQQY.L.

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for QQQY.L and 0.30% for NASD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQQY.L and NASD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer