NASD.L vs. DGIT.L
NASD.L (Lyxor Nasdaq-100 Ucits ETF Acc USD) and DGIT.L (iShares Digitalisation UCITS Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - NASD.L is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while DGIT.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, NASD.L returned 17.79%/yr vs 1.02%/yr for DGIT.L. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NASD.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for DGIT.L.
Performance
NASD.L vs. DGIT.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
NASD.L is traded in USD, while DGIT.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the DGIT.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NASD.L achieves a 19.73% return, which is significantly higher than DGIT.L's 2.39% return.
NASD.L
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- 8.56%
- YTD
- 19.73%
- 6M
- 19.19%
- 1Y
- 40.49%
- 3Y*
- 28.20%
- 5Y*
- 17.79%
- 10Y*
- —
DGIT.L
- 1D
- 1.22%
- 1M
- 9.30%
- YTD
- 2.39%
- 6M
- 1.64%
- 1Y
- 0.16%
- 3Y*
- 14.80%
- 5Y*
- 1.02%
- 10Y*
- —
NASD.L vs. DGIT.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NASD.L Lyxor Nasdaq-100 Ucits ETF Acc USD | 19.73% | 19.87% | 26.82% | 56.40% | -33.39% | 28.25% | 48.47% | 38.09% | -8.81% |
DGIT.L iShares Digitalisation UCITS Acc | 2.39% | 4.31% | 21.96% | 32.15% | -36.43% | 1.12% | 41.50% | 25.41% | -13.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between NASD.L and DGIT.L is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2018 | 0.80 |
Over the past year, the correlation between NASD.L and DGIT.L has dropped to 0.52 - well below their long-term average of 0.80, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
NASD.L vs. DGIT.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
NASD.L
DGIT.L
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Industrials
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
Real Estate
Technology
NASD.L
DGIT.L
Communication Services
NASD.L
DGIT.L
Consumer Cyclical
NASD.L
DGIT.L
Consumer Defensive
NASD.L
DGIT.L
Healthcare
NASD.L
DGIT.L
Industrials
NASD.L
DGIT.L
Utilities
NASD.L
DGIT.L
-
Basic Materials
NASD.L
DGIT.L
-
Energy
NASD.L
DGIT.L
-
Financial Services
NASD.L
DGIT.L
Real Estate
NASD.L
DGIT.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NASD.L vs. DGIT.L — Risk / Return Rank
NASD.L
DGIT.L
NASD.L vs. DGIT.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor Nasdaq-100 Ucits ETF Acc USD (NASD.L) and iShares Digitalisation UCITS Acc (DGIT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NASD.L | DGIT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.02 | +0.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.69 | 0.01 | +3.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.29 | 0.02 | +13.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NASD.L | DGIT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.55 | 0.01 | +2.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 | 0.05 | +0.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.97 | 0.43 | +0.54 |
Drawdowns
NASD.L vs. DGIT.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NASD.L drawdown since its inception was -35.01%, smaller than the maximum DGIT.L drawdown of -46.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NASD.L and DGIT.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NASD.L | DGIT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.01% | -46.83% | +11.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.93% | -23.85% | +12.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.36% | -23.85% | +1.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.01% | -46.83% | +11.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.74% | -6.25% | +5.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.28% | -12.74% | +5.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.04% | 10.28% | -7.24% |
Volatility
NASD.L vs. DGIT.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lyxor Nasdaq-100 Ucits ETF Acc USD (NASD.L) is 4.92%, while iShares Digitalisation UCITS Acc (DGIT.L) has a volatility of 5.82%. This indicates that NASD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DGIT.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NASD.L | DGIT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.92% | 5.82% | -0.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.69% | 13.85% | -2.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.83% | 17.29% | -1.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.79% | 21.30% | -0.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.24% | 20.31% | +0.93% |
NASD.L vs. DGIT.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
NASD.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than DGIT.L's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
NASD.L vs. DGIT.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither NASD.L nor DGIT.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGIT.L iShares Digitalisation UCITS Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NASD.L Lyxor Nasdaq-100 Ucits ETF Acc USD | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.66% | 0.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NASD.L and DGIT.L have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NASD.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NASD.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for DGIT.L.
NASD.L is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while DGIT.L is Technology Equities. NASD.L tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while DGIT.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for NASD.L and 0.40% for DGIT.L.
Find the right allocation for NASD.L and DGIT.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer